Whammy Business wrote: Gatr22 wrote: You seem to think your opinion is the only one that matters, so good for you. My opinions are the only ones consistently supported by facts. Your opinions are just barely-coherent ramblings.

Yes, you are awesome. Just ask yourself if you need confirmation. I could care less if you can barely comprehend my opinion that Miami stunk it up again on the draft or that Henry is a much better back than the injury prone Drake. These are facts and you're a wrong for suggesting otherwise or that it is 'barely coherent. Why did they stink it up? Well a lot depends on the 1st round pick. Let's face it, Tunsil is a risky pick. He'll probably be a guard to start out and hopefully he develops and stay out of the temptations of Miami nightlife. So we'll see. The 2nd round pick involved Miami moving up 4 spots and giving up their 2nd and 4th round picks. Okay corner, probably the best left on the board at that time, but he's not a sure thing either. Review of his game are mixed, but he may pan out. Then there's Drake, one of the most injury prone players in the draft. Never played a complete season in college without injuries and a couple of them major surgery. If he can stay healthy, great, but what did they do to help Tannebomb? Maybe some line help if the 1st round pick pans out long term, but in my OPINION making a move to pick up Henry would have been a lot better. Now they can suck it up for another season and look for a new QB next year when everyone finally realizes that he isn't the man. The difference between me and you is that I don't need to drop in insults, direct or indirect just to make myself feel better

cflames3412 wrote: Here's a good question for the pro Henry group, why would they want to have two of the exact same backs? The Dolphins do not need two power backs. They did not go into this draft thinking that the best way to improve their run game was to make it as one dimensional as humanly possible like Tennessee is going to be. Miami already has a power back, they made the right choice believing in their pick from last year and drafting a player that will complement him wonderfully not take him out of the gameplay as a whole. Checkmate.

Well now, this is just opinion, but I think Henry will be very good, so I don't think Miami has anyone like him. Last year I thought Gurley would be very good, I even picked him on my fantasy team and did very well. These are both SEC backs and I watch a lot of SEC football, so I'm not just basing my opinion on a whim, but it is still just an opinion. If the first two picks pan out and let's say Tunsil becomes a pro-bowl tackle in a few years, Howard becomes a feared lock down corner like his idle Revis and Drake becomes a go to 3rd down back year in and year out, then obviously, it will turn out to be a decent draft. I just don't see it. I have only argued Henry because you claimed Drake was the better back and Henry wouldn't fit in their scheme.........that's just not so. Anyway, get back to me in a few seasons, hopefully Tannebomb is gone and Miami starts to win again

I was never a big Richardson fan, so I would disagree with the comparison. Your point about bama line is valid. Not surprised Richardson was not so good, Henry will be rookie of the year

paulo187 wrote: Trent Richardson ran for 950y and 11 TDs in his rookie year, so not sure you can say he didn't know what a running lane looked like, especially as that was playing for the Browns... Admittedly he's gone to pot since, but for that 1 year he looked good! (Hoping as a Ravens fan he might get a bounce back to form but not expecting much from him, if he even makes the roster)

Nothing wrong with Richardson in his rookie year as exampled above.

Also he might just have the change to bounce back, much like McFadden in Dallas did this year.

projectrracing wrote: paulo187 wrote: Trent Richardson ran for 950y and 11 TDs in his rookie year, so not sure you can say he didn't know what a running lane looked like, especially as that was playing for the Browns... Admittedly he's gone to pot since, but for that 1 year he looked good! (Hoping as a Ravens fan he might get a bounce back to form but not expecting much from him, if he even makes the roster) Nothing wrong with Richardson in his rookie year as exampled above. Also he might just have the change to bounce back, much like McFadden in Dallas did this year.

Everybody could run behind Dallas Oline.