Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
TOTAL BS
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> TOTAL BS Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-08-19 20:37:28
Administrator wrote:

Karma set the number of seats for construction which was more than FAQ limit value. He saw that could build more and confirmed that action. There was no mistake, he wanted to build the number he wanted.

When you enter by construction the number of seats that is over the limit than the system corrects you number to max possible value. If the system doesn't correct your value, that means there is still place to build. This is common knowledge.

It is true, that he was initially mislead by FAQ (although we spoke about it in forum) but when he saw he can go over the FAQ number he did intentionally, there was no mistake about that. Why he did it and how he reacted is his personal thing but such a behaviour (he was also re-correcting moderators stars for swearing in his own post) we won't tolerate to nobody. He isn't a G-I martyr at all. He is clever, devoted and provocative but he must learn that there are limits - for everyone.


Once again an extremely arrogant answer, that confirms what people have been talking about in these threads. It shows that you clearly haven't properly read nor understood what Karma tried to tell you. The total lack of understanding and poor performing customer service has really questions my understanding of the people that actually were behind this game. Personally I actually kick myself now for having supported you with money through a one year Supporter account. Unless there is some major attitude changes in the management then I probably wont renew my Supporter account and will only stay in the game, if this off-season really makes the game a lot better.
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-08-19 21:02:08
This is just another "I tell you, you tell me" thread...

we know:

lack of communication: known before, admins promised it will get better...first small steps are done, lets see how it proceeds

lack of politeness: nothing we can learn from here, simply unnecessary

again I am for locking the topic, it is completely BS like the subject tells us...
  
Vostok
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-08-19 21:11:50
pstimpel wrote:

This is just another "I tell you, you tell me" thread...

we know:

lack of communication: known before, admins promised it will get better...first small steps are done, lets see how it proceeds

lack of politeness: nothing we can learn from here, simply unnecessary

again I am for locking the topic, it is completely BS like the subject tells us...



By the way, what BS stands for?
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-08-19 21:17:38
Vostok wrote:



By the way, what BS stands for?



BullShit

hopefully I will not get banned
  
Vostok
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-08-19 21:20:02
pstimpel wrote:

Vostok wrote:



By the way, what BS stands for?



BullShit

hopefully I will not get banned



Thanks for the info. I hope you won't get banned taking into account that in this context it's just scientifical therminology!
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-08-19 21:23:04
Vostok wrote:



Thanks for the info. I hope you won't get banned taking into account that in this context it's just scientifical therminology!





  
MasterMark
Posts: 2592
Posted on 2009-08-20 7:46:17
pstimpel wrote:

again I am for locking the topic, it is completely BS like the subject tells us...


Peter.. do you really think people would react well to it if someone just locked such a topic? honestly, i don't
  
Supermeek
Posts: 1287
Posted on 2009-08-20 9:38:12
MasterMark wrote:

pstimpel wrote:

again I am for locking the topic, it is completely BS like the subject tells us...


Peter.. do you really think people would react well to it if someone just locked such a topic? honestly, i don't



But wat does it add if kept open?? The main mistake here is that after the Ban, the topic should have been locked up directly (if it's worth a ban, it's worth a lock IMO)
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-08-20 9:58:18
MasterMark wrote:

pstimpel wrote:

again I am for locking the topic, it is completely BS like the subject tells us...


Peter.. do you really think people would react well to it if someone just locked such a topic? honestly, i don't



That is not the point! But I feel like Supermeek in the post above...
  
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-08-20 10:14:18
I can see both Supermeek's and Pstimpel's point of view, but would the problems with communication and how people feel about the customer service of this game then have been talked about? I don't think so, therefore this post can be used for something constructive, even though it sounds very negative and aggressive. By locking a topic like this one, a new one would just have started straight away, since you can try to silence people on the internet, but it will always fail.
  
 
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> TOTAL BS Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5