it'll work. SKITG did it a while back. put all the recievers on one side. set you tactics directions to the other side. btw, when SKITG did it, is was a mistake.

the plays starts, all the right side recievers are running around waiving their hands in the air cos they are open. but the quarterback is looking left, and only left. he get preesured and sacked all game long.

it'll only work for passing, as an runningback will still be able to play that direction.

My stadium will be approx 60,000 + at the start of next season. After a loss in Div 1 I would be at about the same crowd as after a win in div 2. Everything after that means I make more money in div 2.

So I can make more money in Div 2 or get my arse kicked week in and week out in div 1 and lose money.

Hmmmmmm, wonder what I'll do.

If you don't understand that then I have no respect for you at all - none, nada............

On the other hand, I guess I'll also have to factor in the effect of tanking. If there's not much difference then I might go for it. But I doubt it. If you win a lot early then even a few losses late in the year wont drop you down that far after a lot of wins to start.

Daudy wrote: Here you go. 0/76 completions.

When was this game? That must be old. Why would you want to bring that out of the archives.

AtlantaFalconsGuy84 wrote: And I thought 5/27 was bad...

It was a good initiation for the current backup and future starter. 67 hurries, but he wasn't sacked a single time. Twinkle toes!




@BFS It was last season. Funnily enough, I played another team called Ipswich in the cup this season and it was one of the games where I turned up with a bot defence. Teams named Ipswich seem to be my bogey games!

projectrracing wrote: Do the teams from Ipswich imtimidate you into mistakes?

Maybe, I should relocate my team to Ipswich and challenge SKITG to friendlies every week. Now that would earn me a lot of profit.