Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
TD Season 10
Forum index >> Oceania >> TD Season 10 Goto page : 1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14
 
projectrracing
Posts: 7952
Posted on 2012-04-09 1:04:42
Cash_Box wrote:

Well done Bucs, but don't celebrate too hard as I played my backup QB and experimented on strategy ahead of cup game.

I actually find that offensive but ammusing at the same time. Both teams were in the same boat. To take a win away from any team with excuses is not right.

To actually imply that a back up QB with a combined VIS+PAS of 37 is part of the reason for the loss is outragous. 8 of the 10 Teams in TD would love that QB.

I don't think we need to look further into both winning and losing teams playing experiemental tactics or that some players on the winning team played out of the normal BPOS giving the losing team an advantage?
  
Cash_Box
Posts: 276
Posted on 2012-04-09 2:38:10
Ease up mate - was stating a fact not creating an excuse. The orders I used were extreme and account for a low passing percentage.

As for 8/10 TD teams wanting him as a QB then maybe they should have bid on him when put up for sale. Last 4 attempts have gained NO bids !!
  
BuiltForSpeed
Posts: 994
Posted on 2012-04-09 16:53:51
@ project..you gotta be pretty hard up to find that offensive mate..like kerri packer said,"dont get bitter, get better"..
  
projectrracing
Posts: 7952
Posted on 2012-04-10 0:32:44
Yeah I know. But he has dogged me twice now about wins over the 49ers. Final game last year said he gave me the win. Even though I played a bunch of rookies and undeveloped players also, same as him. Probably the reason I am arcing up this time around.

Be a totally different story if I ran a full strength squad with favoured tactics, but I didn't.

Full strength vs under strength. Yeah I'd totally accept the comments.
Under strength vs under strength? Well fair is fair isn't it?

Eveyrone has had their say, so lets move on...

Whom is gonna tank their final games, and whom is gonna fight for one better position on the standings? I know the Bucs will no fall with a loss, but the team above 49ers are playing the Skinks. The Skinks do not need the win. So I doubt I'll make any difference if I win or lose.

Any other coaches looked at their situations?
  
BuiltForSpeed
Posts: 994
Posted on 2012-04-10 3:08:57
projectrracing wrote:

Yeah I know. But he has dogged me twice now about wins over the 49ers. Final game last year said he gave me the win. Even though I played a bunch of rookies and undeveloped players also, same as him. Probably the reason I am arcing up this time around.

Be a totally different story if I ran a full strength squad with favoured tactics, but I didn't.

Full strength vs under strength. Yeah I'd totally accept the comments.
Under strength vs under strength? Well fair is fair isn't it?

Eveyrone has had their say, so lets move on...

Whom is gonna tank their final games, and whom is gonna fight for one better position on the standings? I know the Bucs will no fall with a loss, but the team above 49ers are playing the Skinks. The Skinks do not need the win. So I doubt I'll make any difference if I win or lose.

Any other coaches looked at their situations?



Well, i need to win and i have a 31 point advantage over Kamikaze. I want second spot for sure. A bit of extra money and the prestige of it all. But i will be experimenting again. So i dont really care so much either. I just need to win the RC.
  
Cash_Box
Posts: 276
Posted on 2012-04-10 10:31:47
projectrracing wrote:

Yeah I know. But he has dogged me twice now about wins over the 49ers. Final game last year said he gave me the win. Even though I played a bunch of rookies and undeveloped players also, same as him. Probably the reason I am arcing up this time around.

Be a totally different story if I ran a full strength squad with favoured tactics, but I didn't.

Full strength vs under strength. Yeah I'd totally accept the comments.
Under strength vs under strength? Well fair is fair ?



I'm sorry but I have to again respond as you suggest I'm a sore loser and don't give due credit to wins over 49ers.

Firstly both your wins against us have come in junk time at end of season. I simply stated my position without even looking or caring about Bucs lineup or strategy. If you wish me to bow to apparent brilliance for winning a game of under strength teams and or erratic strategy then woohoo to you !

Early in the season when I got beaten by Wolves for example I publicly stated we were justifiably beaten in a game I was trying to win.
  
BuiltForSpeed
Posts: 994
Posted on 2012-04-10 12:15:07
Ok. why dont you guys play a serious best team friendly to decide who is best?
  
BuiltForSpeed
Posts: 994
Posted on 2012-04-10 12:21:13
Ok. why dont you guys play a serious best team friendly to decide who is best?
  
projectrracing
Posts: 7952
Posted on 2012-04-10 12:28:26
49ers are better. One look at the standings shows it.

Respect is what the issue is about.
  
Cash_Box
Posts: 276
Posted on 2012-04-10 12:55:44
projectrracing wrote:

49ers are better. One look at the standings shows it.

Respect is what the issue is about.



If the issue is respect then I await an apology as I didn't start this argument.

I have not done or said anything that implies a lack of respect towards any fellow manager.
  
 
Forum index >> Oceania >> TD Season 10 Goto page : 1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14
Last posts
2024-05-05 20:21
Ligathread
Author:CarlosPantera
2024-05-04 22:31
EDF
Author:Than59
2024-05-04 12:18
Despre echipa nationala
Author:Radu27
2024-05-04 10:48
Despre echipa nationala
Author:AI_popa
2024-05-03 17:51
Nationalmannschaft
Author:Klomgo
2024-05-01 9:46
Nationalmannschaft
Author:Samuelcrel
2024-05-01 1:28
Inactivity BUG
Author:hoospack