Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Game tickets
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Game tickets Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4
 
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-01-16 18:36:02
Fairly simple math to be honest

If you got $1,000,000 to invest that would make it possible in the following scenarios:

1,428 VIP seats at an income per seat $110 minus the maintenance $7 per seat. So each seat brings in $103 multiplied by the 1,428 seats bought gives $147,084. So it would take $1,000,000 divided with $147,084 home games before the investment has returned. In this case it is 6.8 games, so 7 games.

The Executive situations adds up to 2,500 seats and it would take 7.1 aka 8 home games to get the investment back.

The regular scenario gives 4,000 seats and it would take 13.9 aka 14 home games to get the investment back.
  
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-01-16 18:38:57
yobby wrote:

croverja wrote:

yobby wrote:

croverja wrote:

VIP gives the best return on investment. Then Executive. That's all I have for my answer.



I dig, and that's why i'm continuing to follow the model ... but it does make me wonder. I wish we had a guy good with numbers in the house.



Building too big a stadium doesn't work, so you may want to keep it low, around 40,000 seats if you plan on losing.

As for a numbers guy, serrie figured out the return on investment quickly, ask him I guess. And I'm pretty sure either merc or pstimpel are good with numbers.



bro, i don't understand. how could building too big a stadium not work?


You want to have every single seat sold out, so that you don't loose precious VIP and Executive seats income. My rule of thumb is division basic level multiplied by 1.4. So in the case of Division 5 that would be 36,000 * 1.4 = 50,400 seats (and all VIP and Executive should be build and included in this number).
  
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-01-16 19:06:49
yobby wrote:

croverja wrote:

yobby wrote:

croverja wrote:

VIP gives the best return on investment. Then Executive. That's all I have for my answer.



I dig, and that's why i'm continuing to follow the model ... but it does make me wonder. I wish we had a guy good with numbers in the house.



Building too big a stadium doesn't work, so you may want to keep it low, around 40,000 seats if you plan on losing.

As for a numbers guy, serrie figured out the return on investment quickly, ask him I guess. And I'm pretty sure either merc or pstimpel are good with numbers.



bro, i don't understand. how could building too big a stadium not work?



Look at GBS in the CE TD. He has a maxed out stadium, but because teams beat him, nobody comes. He loses lots of money maintaining seats that noone uses, and mostly sells regular seats.
  
Jinto
Posts: 3527
Posted on 2010-01-16 19:11:52
croverja wrote:


Look at GBS in the CE TD. He has a maxed out stadium, but because teams beat him, nobody comes. He loses lots of money maintaining seats that noone uses, and mostly sells regular seats.



This si why im slowly building up my stadium i dont want to lose loads of cash because i know i wont win every game i play
  
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-01-16 19:23:31
Jinto wrote:

croverja wrote:


Look at GBS in the CE TD. He has a maxed out stadium, but because teams beat him, nobody comes. He loses lots of money maintaining seats that noone uses, and mostly sells regular seats.



This si why im slowly building up my stadium i dont want to lose loads of cash because i know i wont win every game i play


But you can look at it from the other side and say you loose money with every game you win, if your stadium is to small. In your case you would get a standard 48.000 fans showing up to the game, since you are in Division III. Loads of money not being collected at the moment

So it is a fine balance
  
Jinto
Posts: 3527
Posted on 2010-01-16 19:30:37
jespernohr wrote:

Jinto wrote:

croverja wrote:


Look at GBS in the CE TD. He has a maxed out stadium, but because teams beat him, nobody comes. He loses lots of money maintaining seats that noone uses, and mostly sells regular seats.



This si why im slowly building up my stadium i dont want to lose loads of cash because i know i wont win every game i play


But you can look at it from the other side and say you loose money with every game you win, if your stadium is to small. In your case you would get a standard 48.000 fans showing up to the game, since you are in Division III. Loads of money not being collected at the moment

So it is a fine balance



yes but i have been building my team differently than some of the others i put cash into everything but the stadium and intill this season i had a REALLY small stadium and hope to add more this offseason just would rather lose money because of not enough seats than lose cash because i got TOO many seats
  
Serrie
Posts: 3125
Posted on 2010-01-16 19:35:09
Just started building some more seats in my stadium.
Since I pretty much won my division, and will play the AFLC again next season I am making it a 90K stadium.
And because I play an away game the last game of this season, I am making sure that I don't miss any home-game income.
  
yobby
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-01-16 19:44:20
beautiful guys ... thank you so much.
  
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-01-16 19:48:41
I understand where you are coming from, but to me it is the standard attendance plus/minus 40% (this percentage is based on a few observation, so nothing set in stone). This should lead to an attendance in the region of 34,000-67,000. So having a stadium of 34,000 would only give you more money.

Then there is the whole ordeal of the friendly matches will bring in more money per match than a bigger stadium and that is true, expect that if all the money from the home games and friendlies are piled together, then the bigger stadium wins again in the long run.

Of course you are allowed to manage your team as you like and this s just friendly number crunching
  
Jinto
Posts: 3527
Posted on 2010-01-16 20:16:22
jespernohr wrote:

I understand where you are coming from, but to me it is the standard attendance plus/minus 40% (this percentage is based on a few observation, so nothing set in stone). This should lead to an attendance in the region of 34,000-67,000. So having a stadium of 34,000 would only give you more money.

Then there is the whole ordeal of the friendly matches will bring in more money per match than a bigger stadium and that is true, expect that if all the money from the home games and friendlies are piled together, then the bigger stadium wins again in the long run.

Of course you are allowed to manage your team as you like and this s just friendly number crunching



Well i dont really have a need for cash as i haven't really touched the Transfer market since i joined the site because i would rather build my own guys that but someone elses
  
 
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Game tickets Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4