Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Player Evaluations and Advice.- moved to Rookie Forum
 
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 0:23:55
Player #2 is definately a good option for the Defensive Line, and seeing as it is his Natural Position, it is a good idea to keep him there - Especially if he is old! I just thought of Tight End as it made use of his Catching, as well as his Blocking.

Player #3 is interesting. You seem to have alot of patience, so if you are not looking for immediate results, keep playing him at Quarterback. This will take quite a long time, perhaps to the end of the Season depending on his current Cornerback rating.

My take on the old guys is unlike most here. Alot of people see them as valuable members of the team, and will likely buy better, younger guys later in the future. I have sold all of my old guys - except the two that are retiring at the end of the season - and try to promote youth. I do this because I would like all of my players to gain all five stars in Team Chemistry

Guru.
bowlerdude
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 1:12:43
Gurudefence wrote:

Player #2 is definately a good option for the Defensive Line, and seeing as it is his Natural Position, it is a good idea to keep him there - Especially if he is old! I just thought of Tight End as it made use of his Catching, as well as his Blocking.



Agreed. That's what I thought of when I said TE as well. For these things, I tend to look at the players as though they're young and still have relatively low ratings at all positions, that's why I'm suggesting more based on skills - if he's an old player, I'd probably keep him on the D-line too, and he is a good fit there.
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 1:47:31
Which 2 shoild be my TE's?
Wilton Totten (ID 85569)

Western winners (USA)

27 years old Quarterback

Rating Experience Fitness 94%
Talent Team chemistry Wage $ 2,490 p/w
SKILLS
Positioning 4 ............Tackling 1 ...............Punting 7
Vision 3 .............Blocking 6 .............Speed 7
Intelligence 9 ...........Passing 2 ..............Strength 12
Footwork 6 ..........Catching 4 ..................Agility 7
Carrying 5 ............Kicking 2 .............Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 18 ...Consistency 12 ...Weeks at club 27

COMMENTS FROM THE COACH TEAM
Player's natural playing role is Quarterback
He can also play adequately as Wide Receiver
If really needed, he can also step in as Offensive Lineman, Running Back, Defensive Lineman and Cornerback

Milan Kautz (ID 128047)

Western winners (USA)

16 years old Tight End
DEFATT

Rating Experience Fitness 100%
Talent Team chemistry Wage $ 1,027 p/w
SKILLS
Positioning 5 Tackling 1 Punting 5
Vision 1 Blocking 5 Speed 7
Intelligence 19 Passing 4 Strength 8
Footwork 2 Catching 5 Agility 1
Carrying 2 Kicking 5 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 19 Consistency 16 Weeks at club 0

COMMENTS FROM THE COACH TEAM
Player's natural playing role is Tight End
If really needed, he can also step in as Offensive Lineman, Quarterback, Defensive Lineman, Linebacker and Safety

Domenic Durkee (ID 85568)

Western winners (USA)

19 years old Running Back
DEFATT

Rating Experience Fitness 96%
Talent Team chemistry Wage $ 2,301 p/w
SKILLS
Positioning 1 Tackling 7 Punting 1
Vision 4 Blocking 5 Speed 14
Intelligence 14 Passing 7 Strength 13
Footwork 4 Catching 8 Agility 5
Carrying 6 Kicking 2 Stamina 5

OTHER
Teamwork 5 Consistency 20 Weeks at club 28

COMMENTS FROM THE COACH TEAM
Player's natural playing role is Running Back
He can also play adequately as Tight End
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 2:08:11
Player #1 will take a ridiculous amount of time to adapt position to Tight End. Offensive Line would probably be your best bet for this guy, yet a Punter and Wide Receiver are both viable options. He is quite old also, so use him as a last resort.

Player #2 is already a Tight End, and therefore, will not receive any negative affects if he was at a different position. He only has five blocking, and five catching, but with his high Teamwork value, you could be onto a efficient Tight End in a season or two. Also, there doesn't look like any other viable option for this player. You might want to improve his Fitness skills, however.

Player #3 could play almost anywhere except for Kicker, really. However, his teamwork value is not great by all means. Catching is his highest Primary skill, with his Blocking at a good level also. This guy has great Fitness values, too.

Seeing as your question was "Which of these three shall I use as my two Tight Ends?" I would say player #2 and player #3, yet I would use player #3 wisely. He has a lot of short-term potential, which you could use if you are having a problem in any given position.

Hope this helps

Guru.
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 2:10:53
Gurudefence wrote:



Hope this helps

Guru.


It certainly does!
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 2:12:45
croverja wrote:

Gurudefence wrote:



Hope this helps

Guru.


It certainly does!



Ofcourse, this is just my opinion
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 2:18:08
My turn:

Leo John Henry (ID 39916)

Flowbeeeeee (United Kingdom)

16 years old Defensive Lineman

SKILLS
Positioning 4 Tackling 3 Punting 5
Vision 3 Blocking 7 Speed 14
Intelligence 3 Passing 5 Strength 11
Footwork 3 Catching 5 Agility 5
Carrying 3 Kicking 1 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 9 Consistency 11 Weeks at club 43

COMMENTS FROM THE COACH TEAM
Player's natural playing role is Defensive Lineman
If really needed, he can also step in as Tight End, Wide Receiver, Linebacker, Cornerback and Safety


You see, the problem with this guy is that he could be a very valuable Offensive Lineman. However, he has 2.5 stars as a Defensive Lineman. He's performing great on the Line, with 39 tackles in around 9 Games (He's played 11, but two were as Receiver - when I forgot to set my Line-up).

But with only a Teamwork value of 5, he's going to take a while to be good at Tackling!

What do you guys think, or am I being a bit Naiive?

Guru.
Mercutioh
Posts: 7396
Posted on 2008-11-07 2:22:52
I say move him to OL but if you need him on the DL let him ride.
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-11-07 2:29:01
Mercutioh wrote:

I say move him to OL but if you need him on the DL let him ride.



This will take forever though....I do not know whether it is worth the risk. He's averaging 4.3 Tackles a game, which is quite alot! Hmmmm, my Offensive Line is ridiculously week. I'll see what others say.

I'm going to sleep, have a good evening Americans

Guru.
buckeye1022
Posts: 8799
Posted on 2008-11-07 2:30:51
If your OL is weak, then I'd personally take the time and play him there.
 
Last posts
2024-09-20 23:43
Nationaal Team
Author:GitHyper
2024-09-20 21:51
Survivor game
Author:RobTger
2024-09-19 21:53
Survivor game
Author:Radu27
2024-09-19 20:56
Survivor game
Author:philiom
2024-09-19 20:48
Survivor game
Author:Gatr22