Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Has anyone tried...
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Has anyone tried...
 
Zekral
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-03-20 16:28:54
I've been thinking about how I want to build my team in the future (after my current QB ages to 30ish) and I've been considering an empty backfield offense with a high running percentage. I'm looking into building up a good passer with high agility, strength, and speed (sort of like a Michael Vick or Vince Young but a good passer).

So has anyone ever tried an offense like this?

My setup would be something like this

WR WR TE TGCGT TE WR
---------------QB
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2010-03-20 16:31:01
Zekral wrote:

I've been thinking about how I want to build my team in the future (after my current QB ages to 30ish) and I've been considering an empty backfield offense with a high running percentage. I'm looking into building up a good passer with high agility, strength, and speed (sort of like a Michael Vick or Vince Young but a good passer).

So has anyone ever tried an offense like this?

My setup would be something like this

WR WR TE TGCGT TE WR
---------------QB



IMO you need to have at least on HB/FB
  
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-03-20 16:31:34
You need at least 1 RB on the field for it to be a legal formation Sorry to break your dream so fast.
  
mdjseymour
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-03-20 16:36:38
jespernohr wrote:

You need at least 1 RB on the field for it to be a legal formation Sorry to break your dream so fast.



he speaks the truth....
  
Zekral
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-03-20 16:47:09
jespernohr wrote:

You need at least 1 RB on the field for it to be a legal formation Sorry to break your dream so fast.



Oh well, so much for that pipe dream.
  
viktor
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-03-20 17:03:05
besides adding wrs on the same side doesnt really seem to "help"
  
stratamartin
Posts: 2074
Posted on 2010-03-20 18:58:28
viktor wrote:

besides adding wrs on the same side doesnt really seem to "help"



Doesn't seem to help or does absolutely nothing? Hmm cause i play two WR's on one side so just curious.
  
iMan24
Posts: 2
Posted on 2010-03-20 21:59:23
and since RBs help protect
you might as well train an rb with high blocking
  
Jeremiah Kool
Posts: 184
Posted on 2010-03-26 10:30:25
If you have the HB offset either left or right doesn't the QB then assume running duties to the opposite side??

Could play some sort of "Spread Offence then?"
  
viktor
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-03-26 19:59:57
Jeremiah Kool wrote:

If you have the HB offset either left or right doesn't the QB then assume running duties to the opposite side??

Could play some sort of "Spread Offence then?"



QB doesnt really take over all the rush plays towards the other side, if thats what you mean

spread offense


Well sure u can have 6 eligible receivers .... (with a Jim Brown like fullback probably to provide blocking and some decent ypc)
4 WRs 2 TEs

stratamartin wrote:

does not help


IMO yup having an extra receiver doesnt really seem to make a difference.
And when I played a WR3 (worse than WR1,WR2), the overall completion% stats took a bit of a hit.
  
 
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Has anyone tried...
Last posts
2024-10-05 21:33
Ligue Grid Iron Francophone - Officiel (saison 20)
Author:zone rouge
2024-10-05 18:40
Messages I can't delete
Author:philiom
2024-10-05 16:33
Ligathread
Author:liberalmente
2024-10-05 12:40
Verkaufsthread
Author:liberalmente
2024-10-05 10:50
Reprezentácia
Author:Juraj Pavucek
2024-10-05 10:07
Reprezentácia
Author:Hadar
2024-10-04 15:23
Ligue Grid Iron Francophone - Officiel (saison 20)
Author:Le_Dabe
2024-10-04 14:47
Survivor game
Author:Gatr22