Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Who's better?
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Who's better?
 
Kyle Townsend
Posts: 97
Posted on 2010-02-17 3:04:22
Lynwood Ashburn (ID 428293)
17 years old
More experienced QB
Positioning 4 Tackling 7 Punting 5
Vision 4 Blocking 3 Speed 7
Intelligence 7 Passing 6 Strength 8
Footwork 2 Catching 6 Agility 6
Carrying 7 Kicking 1 Stamina 3

Tom Fox (ID 320885)
20 years old
has less team chemistry but getter intel and other skills
Positioning 4 Tackling 5 Punting 3
Vision 2 Blocking 3 Speed 15
Intelligence 17 Passing 4 Strength 9
Footwork 3 Catching 3 Agility 4
Carrying 5 Kicking 2 Stamina 4

i would just like to know who you think is the better qbLast edited on 2010-02-17 at 21:46
  
stratamartin
Posts: 2074
Posted on 2010-02-17 3:13:44
You say who is the better back right? just wondering cause you said most experienced qb so.

But yeah, surely number 2, the first guy has speed of 7, now there is problems when the Oline is faster than the back surely:p And team chemistry grows with playing so no need to worry about this.
  
TheFreakinStud
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-02-17 4:50:26
Kyle Townsend wrote:

Lynwood Ashburn (ID 428293)
17 years old
More experienced QB
Positioning 4 Tackling 7 Punting 5
Vision 4 Blocking 3 Speed 7
Intelligence 7 Passing 6 Strength 8
Footwork 2 Catching 6 Agility 6
Carrying 7 Kicking 1 Stamina 3

Tom Fox (ID 320885)
20 years old
has less team chemistry but getter intel and other skills
Positioning 4 Tackling 5 Punting 3
Vision 2 Blocking 3 Speed 15
Intelligence 17 Passing 4 Strength 9
Footwork 3 Catching 3 Agility 4
Carrying 5 Kicking 2 Stamina 4

i would just like to know who you think is the better back



The better running back is most definitely number two.
  
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-02-17 5:11:39
Number two is a better RB or QB than number 1.
  
viktor
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-02-17 18:36:04
if u need to assign them positions
No 2 would be the l-term Qb and no the soon-to-be retired RB(though u can increase his Blocking and make him a FB, which might help your running game. But then again just a handful of teams have a successful running game in the higher leagues. So well....)
  
Kyle Townsend
Posts: 97
Posted on 2010-02-17 21:47:41
I meant the better qb sorry...I'm kinda leaning towards tom fox being the starting qb even tho his team chemistry is low.
  
Monkey
Posts: 7
Posted on 2010-02-17 21:49:34
Kyle Townsend wrote:

I meant the better qb sorry...I'm kinda leaning towards tom fox being the starting qb even tho his team chemistry is low.



yes tom fox is better QB
  
mdjseymour
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-02-17 21:56:26
Monkey wrote:

Kyle Townsend wrote:

I meant the better qb sorry...I'm kinda leaning towards tom fox being the starting qb even tho his team chemistry is low.



yes tom fox is better QB



agreed... and remember team chemistry goes up easily... so its not an issue if you plan on him playing regularly...
  
 
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Who's better?
Last posts
2024-10-05 21:33
Ligue Grid Iron Francophone - Officiel (saison 20)
Author:zone rouge
2024-10-05 18:40
Messages I can't delete
Author:philiom
2024-10-05 16:33
Ligathread
Author:liberalmente
2024-10-05 12:40
Verkaufsthread
Author:liberalmente
2024-10-05 10:50
Reprezentácia
Author:Juraj Pavucek
2024-10-05 10:07
Reprezentácia
Author:Hadar
2024-10-04 15:23
Ligue Grid Iron Francophone - Officiel (saison 20)
Author:Le_Dabe
2024-10-04 14:47
Survivor game
Author:Gatr22