Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Nationality vs. Team chemistry
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Nationality vs. Team chemistry
 
JM Henriksen
Posts: 435
Posted on 2009-06-26 15:48:25
Does nationality of a player matter with regards to gaining team chemistry? Should it? Would having a roster consisting of one player from each nation in the game matter with regards to team chemistry?
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-06-26 15:59:23
JM Henriksen wrote:

Does nationality of a player matter with regards to gaining team chemistry? Should it? Would having a roster consisting of one player from each nation in the game matter with regards to team chemistry?



Do you think it should? From the experience of my favorite Football Club (most of the guys are non professional germans, and some are "soldiers" from countries like USA, UK...) there is a quite good integration - some of that "soldiers" driving home in October (offseason) and sign for another season next year, others not. It depends on the guy, so it is covered by teamwork / team chemistry already
  
dieselpower
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-06-26 21:48:01
By soldiers you mean mercenary?
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-06-26 22:37:09
dieselpower wrote:

By soldiers you mean mercenary?



probably
  
Krs71
Posts: 1380
Posted on 2009-06-26 23:19:33
I think it should be in suggestions. New players from other country have to play twice as many games to gain full chemistry. It should be a really good idea. Language, cultural diffrences and staff like this
  
skinkeskyter
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-06-27 0:01:29
-1 to making it harder for foreign players to gain chemistry. A) it's allready hard enough. B) this would give an advantage to those countries with more players.
  
JM Henriksen
Posts: 435
Posted on 2009-06-27 1:00:32
pstimpel wrote:

Do you think it should?



I haven't really made up my opinion on the matter, but it might be worth a discussion if nothing else. I mean; I've seen teams where the performance of a player is severly hindered by cultural aspects, but I've also seen teams where it doesn't seem to matter. I assume nationality vs. team chemistry would be the natural combination to pick it up on if such a thing was to matter in Grid-Iron.

In a way I think it would be neat, but it is not something I personally would put forward in suggestions at this point.
  
MasterMark
Posts: 2592
Posted on 2009-06-27 13:16:00
skinkeskyter wrote:

-1 to making it harder for foreign players to gain chemistry. A) it's allready hard enough. B) this would give an advantage to those countries with more players.


couldn't agree more. especially to B.)
  
MasterMark
Posts: 2592
Posted on 2009-06-27 13:16:19
skinkeskyter wrote:

-1 to making it harder for foreign players to gain chemistry. A) it's allready hard enough. B) this would give an advantage to those countries with more players.


couldn't agree more. especially to B.)
  
JM Henriksen
Posts: 435
Posted on 2009-06-27 15:37:59
skinkeskyter wrote:

B) this would give an advantage to those countries with more players.



Yeah, I agree to this unless one clumps nations together, which would be natural if this was to be used at all. Still, some regions (Asia, Africa as of right now) would be at a disadvantage if this was something that was more than a random once-in-a-while-thing.
  
 
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Nationality vs. Team chemistry