Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Youth players
 
ringsoft
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-05-14 11:30:20
I'd welcome some input about youth players...

If I take on a youth player and decide he's not worth keeping, do I suffer any financial penalty for firing him?

What's the general approach to youth players? With money getting tighter, is it worth taking one on every week and adding to the wage bill?

Presumably they have minimal sale value as they generally aren't very skilled and take time to develop?
  
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-05-14 11:36:39
ringsoft wrote:

If I take on a youth player and decide he's not worth keeping, do I suffer any financial penalty for firing him?



You do not.

ringsoft wrote:

What's the general approach to youth players? With money getting tighter, is it worth taking one on every week and adding to the wage bill?



It is worth it, as youth players wages are not too high. Always lower than $2000, I believe.

ringsoft wrote:

Presumably they have minimal sale value as they generally aren't very skilled and take time to develop?



Perhaps. But you may land a 20 consistency, 20 teamwork and 20 intelligence guy?

Just pull a youth player, if you do not like him, fire him. You have nothing to lose
  
ringsoft
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-05-14 12:03:52
OK... I recall reading somewhere about having a tax levied on players sold on after a short period - as this doesn't apply to youth players, it's obviously a no-lose opportunity to check one out each week.

Thanks!
  
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-05-14 12:10:53
The tax will still be there, but only on sales between players. If you cut him, then there are no penalty.
  
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-05-15 5:23:01
You can pick one once every two weeks now.
  
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)HarborGI Supporter
Posts: 773
Joined: 2009-01-08
II.1
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2009-05-15 15:38:39
"We hope this would bring player's market to life"

So, now young teams (YT) won't have enough youngsters for the future, while the older teams (OT) do. If YT go to the transfers, they don't have money to buy good players, the OT can spend more anyway. And even if YT spend all their money for players, they have no chance to build a stadium.

So if the goal was to destroy any hopes of YT to ever be equal to OT - it's hard to find the better decision.

By the way - 3-4 first seasons in any game is the time of weak transfer activity. Nothing can be done to chang it anyway.Last edited on 2009-05-15 at 15:41
  
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-05-15 15:40:48
Harbor wrote:


So if the goal was to destroy any hopes of YT to ever be equal to OT - it's hard to find the better decision.



And please tell me how this can happen?

I really do not understand how the game can be even in the short term. In the long run I am sure further suggestions will be implemented.

It just seems that with every implementation, people criticise.
  
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)HarborGI Supporter
Posts: 773
Joined: 2009-01-08
II.1
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2009-05-15 15:49:00
I criticise only bad implementation
The game has 2 seasons behind. So in this case i would let any team to pick youngsters every week for 2 seasons from the team creation date. So if you have a team today you will get the same number of youngsters that any OT. It would be fair. What done now is bad for YT, nobody could argue this fact.

And by 'ever' i don't mean ever ever of course =)) But a several seasons.Last edited on 2009-05-15 at 15:52
  
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-05-15 15:51:48
Indeed, nobody can argue that.

So what would you like to do? Stop additions to the game from today, so that we can all help the users that joined today?

You know as much as I do that doing something such as your suggestion would take a lot of time, and probably a lot programming (which is probably the complete opposite to the current).

That aside, I would like to think that new users would understand that the game is continuously improving.
  
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)HarborGI Supporter
Posts: 773
Joined: 2009-01-08
II.1
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2009-05-15 16:04:54
But what we have now sounds like 'if you (programmer) can't do good at least do bad'. I hear administration saying 'we want to help YT' and i say 'good' and then i see them doing such things. And i ask my(and any other)self 'why?'. If you can't help, don't hinder. I stand for any implements that do this game better, but it's not one of them IMO. It's negative and shouldn't have been done ever if it couldn't have been in proper way.