cup games to be fair with people who are really in the game should be this way .

- all games should be against bots until all of them are eliminated from the tournament
then will be fair . to have a match against a real player in cup when are still bot teams in the tournament is not fair AT ALL ! , its the best time to do some cash , so please admins, FIX THAT!

please answer this topic with
I AM AGREE !

freakyfullback wrote: Seems a sensible suggestion - I play a similar online basketball game that uses this approach. Unlikely anything will change though.

I AM AGREE!!!

I AM AGREE!!!!

freakyfullback wrote: tonimaltraste wrote: all games should be against bots until all of them are eliminated from the tournament I've just been burned by this, having lost in Round 3 to a fellow Division II team. The financial implications are huge..... from a position of expecting to make it as far as the last 32 or 16, this amounts to a loss in the region of $4-5m for the season, meaning I'm going to have to sell 4 or 5 first-teamers. Doesn't really feel fair when other managers could potentially get 5-6 consecutive rounds playing BOT teams.

These draws are just mad...

BOTS should either be eliminated early in the rounds or set to default away when playing. I played a BOT team and had a wooping attendance of 35k at their stadium. Not that I could have gotten more seats since I am tanking this season, but loosing like you did early in the Cup it rough and shows that the finances in this game are too constraint. Many have too much and many are at the struggling-point.

For me, there will be no other reason to get to TD than the show. Being #1 demands a S***load of bank or an ability to VPN to Asia, set up a fake Gmail and then request a new team. Bing - you're in TD within 3-4 seasons and get a good, decent shot at AFLC.

I am truly sorry for your loss. I hope you manage and can get some funds in, but even the transfer market is in shambles.

exactly, admin looks only exist for get the profits in his paypal account

shmertnickname wrote: !!!ADMIN DON;T EXIST !!! but i agree - something, anythgin, needs to change