Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Rocking Rackets
Forum index >> Off topic >> Rocking Rackets Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4
 
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-10-05 22:13:41
Bruno Corbalan:

With a run of other future 1s. He managed to win 3 in a row to get him into position to get into the top 200 before the end of the year, the only regular opposition was Haeusler from Austria. He was good enough to go to give Corbalan a match but not good enough to win.

Then somehow Bruno simply didn't want to get into the top 200. Getting knocked out in the semis and even the quarters of an FT2. He ends up finishing the year just outside the top 200. He does get there with a final appearance at another JG1. It is likely up to the Challenger level next. With players up to the top 50 it will be tough till he gets a seeding.


Natalio Arvizu:

In the junior US Open he made it to the semi finals before getting beat by Vilkas. Vilkas goes against Koudelka in the final. Once again, for the 4th time, Koudelka comes up short in the final and Vilkas takes his second major of the year and 2nd place from Arvizu.

Vilkas got his next in the final of the Osako's Mayor Cup with a win against Ayer in the final as well as once again beat Arvizu in the semi finals. He simply does not have the ability to take on the hard court specialists and there are a lot of big hard court competitions. The semi final appearance was repeated at the Orange bowl, this time he took off a set off Ayer who went on to win. In the final major of the year, the Casablanca Cup, it went a bit pear shaped with a third round exit to Barquero who I had expected more from. Ayer wins to secure the year end number 1 spot. Arvizu ends in number 3 after a decent final season in juniors.

At the start of the next year I pushed him a bit much and he dropped out early of 2 FT3 competitions. He will take a step back to Amateur though I really did think he could take it.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-10-11 0:04:15
Bruno Corbalan:

Has mostly been pottering around the top 200 mark. Challengers have guys close to the top 50 and higher in them. Even the CH3s which are worth less points. Without a seeding it makes it hard to move up as you are bound to run into one early. However whenever he is in the top 200 he can't play futures. Still he is getting decent exp off of practise competitions at the moment so I am not too worried just yet. Too good for futures and not good enough for challengers. Burmann still leads the charge for Bruno's year and has managed to reach the top 30 including a win in a 250 series event. It will be interesting to see how he continues.

Natalio Arivzu:
Has caught up with Bruno physically and nearly technically as well. He is younger but is also expected to have a slightly shorter career overall. I tried one or two Amateur events but the exp was terrible in practise sessions because they were too one sided. You play against similarly ranked opponents so I have been giving him just singles competitions and as many as I can without over playing him. He has reached 306th and is still winning all his practise matches but only just. Maybe top 300 will be enough for him right now. He has an FT3 event upcoming that should get him there. Then he can take a long break from all competitions as he goes back into a proper training schedule. Still it has been a painful time for him growth wise as he has not been getting the exp he should have. If only I had stuck with futures or he had gotten luckier draws in his first two. Aside from a semi final appearance at an FT1 in Portugal those are his only losses and he has an FT1 win as well.

I have also been working to improve his clay court ability to max out his specialisation there. Overall not the busiest time period, that will come when Bruno starts threatening the top 100. Technically speaking both players will improve slightly physically in the coming while and so it will be a while before they start losing their edge. As such I am not too worried about rushing them just yet.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-10-16 18:32:48
Bruno Corbolan:

To finish off the year Bruno has mostly been playing challengers and bouncing off them. I have tried to be a bit more aggressive with them but even then it is hard to get a decent seeding to actually make a serious run through them. Bruno will either need a stroke of luck to fall his way or to wait until he is ready to blitz any opposition in the Challenger level. His crowning achievement was a semi final appearance at a CH1 event. That did require getting lucky enough for a seeding and a good win over Ray Caravia. Caravia came through the junior ranks with Corbolan but on clay Caravia should be the better. Still it has been brought back to a close enough level that Corbolan managed the upset over 3 tight sets. Even that only replaced an FT1 win he had had from a year previous. Unfortunately he can't keep playing futures as he is better ranked than 200th in the world. The second round results in CH3s (at the end of the season right before the break so everyone was playing them for match time = no seeding) provided a much lower level of points. He is at 179th in the world.

I took a look at some of his old competitors from juniors 3 years on. Most have a ranking of around the 8 mark with Bruno on 7.7, this is much closer than he was a few years ago. He has gained more experience and is catching up. Indeed he has caught up on a few. Technically speaking Stagg should be the top player with a rnaking of 8.27 but it is Burmann, with a ranking of 7.9 who leads the field and has in fact somehow managed to get himself to 22nd in the world!


Natalio Arvizu:

Has had a much better year. I have started to hold back from his aggressive schedule. He is getting better matches now he has made the top 250 but he has a fair few FT1s under his belt. The step up to Challenger will be his next task, he has watched his club mate bounce off them a bit so far and his club mate has held the advantage so far whenever they have met in practise competitions.

Doubles has gone far better for Arvizu than it did for Corbolan. Not sure what the reason is but he has some FT1 titles in both singles and doubles at this point leaving him at 230th in singles and 790th in doubles.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-10-25 0:56:25
Bruno Corbolan:

Bruno has settled himself in the 150-200 range. Getting higher is tough. I think he will do a big jump in one go. He has made a few top 4s in various challengers but has yet to make a top 4 seed and has found himself outside the seedings a few times. Indeed his best result is the semi final in CH2 which is just the same as a win at FT1 level. He has plenty of them and would have more if he was allowed to play in more futures.

Interestingly the doubles have gone far better bringing him up to 266th including a win in a CH1. Several of those wins were with Natalio when he had to play challengers for a few months. Not sure where he goes, he should be reaching further in the challengers but he ends up having to go through too many big matches. He has gotten a few upsets but unless he gets the win in the competition it simply is not enough extra points to make his way up the ranks. 2 or 3 wins would be best to ensure a top 4 rank in all challengers really.


Natalio Arvizu:

At the start of the year he quickly broke the top 200 due to having played his fair share of competitions. This meant he had to play a few challengers until a few of his big results from last year went out of date. I have not kept up the quick rate of playing competitions so he has less competitions counting towards his total. He is being challenged in his practise competitions so I am ok with him hanging around the 200 mark for the moment. He got on well in doubles pairing with Corbolan for doubles competitions when he was in challengers getting to 334th in doubles. 216th for the moment in singles. Futures also give him more games as he wins them easily meaning I can get in more practise weeks. I have even seen him get wins against top 50 players in practise.

An issue with both players and the quicker rate of play is that they need plenty of extra training from Drescher. I am thankful I have the trainer but I frequently waste spare fatigue when I am busy or asleep. I can avoid it if I remember to spend some time training whenever they get too fresh at least but I have to remember, each training session takes a few minutes and a couple are needed each time. Still I should remember I have no fear of them getting too tired, they are both exceptionally fit and hard working players. This is their big advantage and I need to take advantage of this as much as possible. They still get plenty of benefit, realistically I am only missing out on a few extra exp as I have been decent at it and so not the end of the world. Maybe a point or so of skill over the course of their careers so far.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-11-16 3:13:59
Bruno Corbalan:

Well he has finally made his slam debut. He went to the US open and was seeded against a top 4 seed in round 1 which went about as well as expected. He lost his second qualifier in the doubles so not a great week. Still I feel he was unlucky to end up against a seed that high in round 1 and he still got decent experience for that match. I think in the year end challengers I aimed too high with him as well. Each was packed as there were so few available and a big break coming up over the new year. Still he managed to scrape enough form to do him until the Australian Open which he was pretty much forced to enter or risk losing too much form. He got a bit luckier this time and got through round 1 easily. Round 2 was against the 14th seed, Joao Sagar from the Netherlands but was a player falling down the rankings and is living on past glories/high seeding. It gave Bruno a chance of a win which he took with both hands over 4 sets. Definitely a great result, Sagar is only 28 so shouldn't be in complete free fall yet. It also gave him an unseeded opponent for round 3 which was a thrilling 5 set encounter with both players coming from a set behind. In the end Bruno Corbalan finally got the win in the final set winning 8-6. Then he ended up against the no. 3 seed Toca and was dumped out in short order. 1 match off of the second week and 180 ranking points never mind all the experience gained. Slams give lots of extra experience. He will find those points hard to defend next year but will come in handy to get better seedings until then. A few weels later he won his first Challenger level 1 event gaining 100 ranking points and getting him to the top 50! The past year he had largely stalled around the 70th place level but was suddenly up to 47th which was pretty good. The battle for top 32 (and a seed in all slams/larger master events) is the next goal. It will need a fair few good results but he has room to improve on previous results and there are certainly some fading players in the top 32 who will only get worse over the year. The issue will be getting a large enough group of competitions to allow for a bad result or so, even now he doesn't even have the 18 competitions played in the last year so that will have to step up a bit. In the mean time he will play the slams and maybe some of the bigger masters.


Natalio Arvizu:

He has been played a bit more aggressively than Bruno. He is still at his physical peak but it is a question of how long. Still he is jumping past the 200th wall a lot more effecitvely than Corbalan did. He has not managed as many wins in terms of getting up to 114th in the rankings but a fair few good placings in Challenger events. Leaves plenty of room for the position to be improved upon. I will see what the more aggresive style will do. It may hurt him in development but getting involved in bigger competitions could be a big boon. Especially as there is a positive feedback loop, a high ranking leads to better results which leads to a higher ranking... Given Bruno's success he will take the step to the slams as well, it might not work out as it will depend on the draw but any sort of run there would lead to a lot of experience. Quick update, after winning a CH2 ( and winning a match vs Corbalan, on clay albeit) he is now in the top 100!


I also added to my stable. There should be a big enough gap between Arivizu and these so they end up in pretty different generations of players. I may also ditch one in a few years if a decent young prospect comes along as they are the same age and will stop me from having a big gap of no players reaching their peak. They are the Irish Neill Summerset and the Columbian Nicolas Acero. I will probably report on them less as I reckon they will be less interesting.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-11-25 15:27:50
Bruno Corbalan:

Since skipping Wimbledon he has had a decent period. He even managed to get a seed for the US Open thanks to a few higher ranked players not showing up. It went precisely to seeding making the 3rd round before losing to Clericat who is the number 1 ranked player. He even managed to take the first set before losing. No shame in that and a nice 90 ranking points. He has tended to be winning a few more challengers, including one against Vilkas who was a contemporary of Arvizu on hard. Vilkas is a hrad court specialist so it was a a good win even if it came with home court advantage. He did lose a final against Vilkas as well on hard courts though. Still he has enough challenger wins to finally get him in the top 30. To finish off he entered into Paris masters. Both singles and doubles to get through the quiet new year season with enough form. Unfortunately he lost in round 1 of qualifying for the doubles so he will need a futures competition in the new year to keep form up and he can only enter those in doubles due to his ranking. In the singles he did not have a ranking but he got a nice draw round 1 before facing against Colanovic. The Serb was the number 1 ranked Junior player the year in between Corbalan and Arvizu, in fact he dominated if memory serves but was ranked 15 here. The Serb had a bigger serve and was the stronger but is slightly slower and not near as good from the baseline which ended up being his undoing and Corbalan knocked out the seed in straights. He lost the 3rd round to Lazutin who partially specialises in indoor which few players do.

So it certainly looks like he can rise up the ranks from 27th but maybe not to the top. He finishes the year in 28th and next year will be aiming for 16th or maybe even 8th at a stretch. The big issue next year is that he needs to beat a few higher ranked players. He has to enter all majors/slams due to his top 30 finish to the year and will likely be ineligible for any Challengers which were easy ranking points for him this year (you have to be ranked 32nd or worse for those). It would also be nice if he could pick up ranking points from the world cup but there are enough Spainish players ahead of him to make that really unlikely. He has a fair few ranking points to defend in the Australian in a few weeks so we will see where he is after that. His progress has largely stalled with only minor progress on his skills as he ages and his physicals are slowly starting to decline. He is still improving but is unlikely to get much higher. 73rd to 28th in a year was good progress at least.


Natalio Arvizu:

His own jump was 126th to 46th. Top 32 next year is a minimum requirement. He was also unlucky in both the slams he was in this year facing seeds in both the French and the US. As any slams have to count for seeding it is a rough one on his rank. Hopefully he can get lucky in at least one next year as entering them is great for experience. He is still carting along a few too many semi final appearances in there as counting competitions. Still as his rank improves he will get easier runs to the final and they will disapear. None of his big results run out for a while yet either. I had hoped that he could make the end of year season count but it was too congested and he had some poor performances in there as well. Maybe I could have picked better competitions as well. I had thought to enter him into on emore but decided he would be better of training, one competition win won't help that much at a challenger level. Better to be well prepared for the next season and he had lost enough experience with the other challenger events. He is also starting his slow decay but should have a bit more improvement than Corbalan left in him.

He wants about 300 more points next year, each competition win that replaces a semi final appearance is 60 -> 90 points (if he manages a win at CH+ level) so it should be doable. Especially if the slams go a bit better this year. World cup matches are not out of the question in the next few years. He is ranked 4th and needs to reach the top 2 to make it in. There is a 29 year in there who should drop off rapidly even if he is 8th right now and a 25 year old who should be touchable in the next few years in spite of a good career. That just leaves Coya (Arvizu is 22) who will likely be joining Arvizu on a future team. In terms of up and comers who could hit that level it is only Olega who is barely in the top 100 at 22 who could possibly make a push. The big issue is how to knock the 25 year old off that perch quickly (or reach Coya, currently in 31st place).


Neill Summerset and Nicolas Acero:

Both are improving rapidly, they are improving physically through age and when your base skill levels are low they are cheap. Acero is going to go out of JG5 level now, he was generally winning them and the new year means all juniors take a big jump in the rankings as the old juniors are kicked out. Summerset probably needs to go at that level a bit more. His skills are not up to task yet and has only a final appearance to his name (that was to Acero though). He should at least start to get ranked at them at least.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-12-09 23:55:12
Bruno Corbalan:

To keep his form up he entered a doubles future competition in week 1. He can't enter futures as a singles player. It did not go as planned as lost in round one. The 250 in Brisbane was hardly much better as he lost in the quarters but it got his form up to a decent level. With only one noticable absense in the Australian he was ranked 27th and kept to his seeding beat unseeded opponents before losing to Lazutin (Ranked 6) in the 3rd. Decent performance but does not match his previous years 4th round so he loses 90 ranking points and is back to the Challenger level (though all majors have to be played as he finished in the top 30). Stagg won his first slam to take 1st position in the rankings. The rise of Corbalan's generation is complete as they have reached no. 1. No one else in the top 10 though (although Malmberg from Arvizu's generation is in the top 10).

Another quarter final appearance in a 250, this time in Sofia, did little to help his ranking and he accepted the benefits of his lower ranking to win a CH2 to get a seed for Indian Wells. Indian Wells itself was a disaster. He had a bye for round 1 and lost in round two to the 51st ranked Acquaviva. It was on a final set tie break but still - all masters/slam results count for ranking points potentially knocking out better results Corbalan now has a 10 to deal with till this time next year. Stagg won here as well. Miami went far better. Ranked 32nd he knocked out the 13th ranked Burmann who is poor on hard courts in 3 sets to make the top 16. He then went out to Malmberg in which there is no shame. Still 90 ranking points is decent if not incredible (same as a CH2). The winner was once again Stagg who has won all majors thus far.

Next up was the clay court swing. I am unsure if Monte Carlo was a good idea, it is not technically a masters but as a 500 it is pretty likely to have to count and it only has 16 seeds. Corbalan got knocked out in round 2 against Huinaguenta who was seeded. Ex no 1 Clericat took the title here. In Madrid there were only 16 seeds but Corbalan had to enter anyway. He did well knocking out the 9th seed Lazutin who had beaten him in the Australian before again losing to Malmberg. Burmann who dominated the clay season when Corbalan was a junior took the title here for his first masters. Drawing Clericat who had retaken number 1 spot in round 2 was his undoing in Rome. Unfortunate and a risk with these masters with few seeds. Malmberg took the honours here. To end the clay court season Corbalan was ranked 31st for Rolland Garros and ended against Caravia in round 3 having brushed aside the unseeded players. He then lost to clay specialist Caravia after bringing him to two tie breakers and losing both. Burmann took his first slam here and reached the top 10 having spent a few years dithering in the 11-15 area. A CH+ win for Corbalan finally pushed him properly out of the challenger level again.

He entered Eastborne as a warm up for Wimbledon and in spite of being seeded 3rd he lost to 5th seed Scrimshaw in a disappointing upset for another quarter final loss at 250 level. Seeded 25th for Wimbledon itself he again swatted away the unseeded players before facing Lazutin for the 3rd time this year. The higher ranked hard court specialist struggled and Bruno took him out in 4 for his second slam 4th round appearance! Jan Dieter de Baur unfortunately had no such issues in round 4 and Corbalan struggled to break him leaving him still waiting for his first appearance in week 2 of a slam. Clericat won the competition to attempt to reclaim number 1 spot.

In Ggstadd he finally made a semi final in a 250. He lost to French winner Burmann which was expected. In Canada he was again unseeded and was against Caravia in round 1. The guy is a clay specialist and not much better than Corbalan who beat his higher ranked opponent easily. An early exit for Burmann meant that Corbalan was against Colanovic in round 3. In a match for the ages the first two sets were decided by 1 break, Corbalan losing the first and winning the second before both players held serve in the third. In the resulting tie break Corbalan won 13-11 to make hsi first major quarter finals! Clericat was waiting there and Corbalan did well winning the second set but it was not to be unfortunately. The IRanian Sabiri won this in a bit of a shock. Cincinnati was a bit of a come down to earth as he lost in round 1 to the Swedish Anderberg-neither was seeded but Anderberg is higher ranked. 10 more ranking points from a major for the next year. Malmberg won this against Vilkas in the final- both were in Arvizu's junior class. In the US there was little trouble till the 3rd round where he faced Kao from Chinese Tapei. He had to face a top 16 seed here and getting the 16th was pretty lucky. He won in straights with each set incredibly tight, two in tie breakers. In his 3 4th round appearance at a slam he lost to the Canada masters winner Sabiri in 4 losing two tie breakers. Malmberg won this beating Stagg in the final to take top spot in the world at 23! The final 3 sets all came down to tie breaks with Malmberg winning two of them.


In the Asian swing he did decently, making the top 4 in the Malaysian Open (a 250) and a quarter final at the Japan Open (a 500) netting 90 points each time. Shanghai did not go well losing to Russian qualifier Hromec in 3 in round 1 (And 10 points from a masters). Sabiri took his second masters crown of the year here. The following week at the Stockholm Open (a 250) he managed to work his way into his first professional final! He lost to Swedish indoor specialist Bakken who won for the second time (and was a finalist last year). He started to enter doubles to improve his form for the Christmas break at this point. In Paris he ended up against Calmette, the 5th seed in round 2 for a disapointing 45 ranking points. Still that loss was expected. Calmette won the title here. Corbalan obviously did not make the World Tour Finals (the top 8 only). Malmberg the top seed had a disaster winning no sets never mind matches. Sabiri vs Stagg and Calmette vs Clericat was the semis with Clericat beating Stagg in the finals for his third in a row (and 4th finals in a row).

In the end Corbalan moved from 27th to 25th over the year. Not bad given he only had a few Challenger's to help him out. It is just tougher to get ranking points when you can't enter them. So many of the big competitions he has to enter require beating a higher seed just to get to 90 points (which is under 125 or 100 he would get for a top tier challenger). Still they allowed him to pick up some 180s (Wimbledon, US, Canada). He is still 800 points off of top 16 but I am hopeful he will get there. Maybe with a second week appearance or two at slams. Hopefuly he can continue to improve a bit as well. In terms of ranking ability he has still been edging slightly forward so he is a better player than last year but only just at 8.48 from 8.36. World Number 1 Malmberg ends up at 8.77 for reference so he is in the ballpark but not quite there. Still it shows he would do better if he already had the ranking. Malmberg is a special case with great endurance and talent for incredible skills but is poor physically.




Natalio Arvizu:

Started 47th after a disapointing end of year period. It did not start much better with a Quarter final exit in a CH1 and a first round exit in the Australian (to 13th seed Caravia). In fact he struggled till weeks 12/13 when he won two clay CH2s. He notched up a few more Challenger wins before Rolland Garros where he took out the seeded clay specialist Amati in round 1 to get his first slam win! He made it to round 3 where he lost to Sabiri (who went on to have a good year as specified in Corbalan's write up).

In Wimbledon he got away with no seeded opponents in round 1 but had Huinaguenta, the 10th seed in round 2 which is where is competition ended. After Wimbledon he had a bit of a mixed period losing a fair few semi finals but getting a few more wins as well. Too many semi final appearances in Challengers that count for his ranking.

In the US he beat the 22nd seeded Gherea in the second round after 5 sets with 3 tie breaks (Arvizu won only 1 of them). He ended up against aging country mate Toca in round 3. The 14th seed was slightly over played as he was in doubles as well and Arvizu took advantage taking him out in 3 to make round 4! At this point I had two players in round 4. Unfortunately he lost to 19th seed Bassagoiti who had beaten Clericat. Still he was the last unseeded player standing. Several weeks later he was in a CH+ to try and get into the top 30!. Round 1 was a struggle as he scraped a tie break in set 1 after Borot had several set points and lost the second 6/1. He won the 3rd to win the match. He hammered everyone else. So close to a disaster but it was a great success.

He made the quarters in the Swiss Indoors (a 500). Then a terrible msitake as I entered him into the Paris masters. I did not have to as he was not in the top 30 last year and he would not have a seed as it is a small competition. Indeed he ended up getting in on a wild card and lost in round 1 in 3 sets! 10 points that have to count as Paris is a masters comptition. Again the end of year period did not help him as he lost in an indoor CH+ in Helsinki to Borot in the semi finals (remember him from another indoor CH+ earlier?). He ended up finishing the year in 33rd after the poor end to the year. He is also still about a 100 points short of the Argentinian team. Toca is the likely person he will take over from though as he is aging quickly at 30 years old and is entering a lot of doubles. Arvizu also has some more improvement to do. His ability rating is 8.3 up from about 8.15 last year.





Juniors: Summerset was ditched for the incredibly talented Cason (4.9) so I will look at his development with interest. Not much to report from either. Acero broke the top 50 juniors. Hopefully I will get these done more often and not make them so big.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-12-23 21:27:05

As they are going to be entering the same competitions from here on out most of the time (and for all the big ones) I will just seperate by competition as opposed to by player.


Bruno Corbalan entered the Qatar open in both singles and doubles for form. He was unseeded and lost to Huinaguenta in the second round but won the doubles so far representing my first pro title! Natalio Arvizu on the other got bounced quickly from the Auckland competition. In the Australian he matched his seeding to get to the last 32 and faced his country mate Caravia then. He may have been ranked 12th but he is a clay specialist and so Corbalan won the first two sets handily before they traded tie break sets to send Corbalan through to another 4th round encounter. Here his opponent was the Dutch Vennemars who is ranked 7th and likes the hard courts. I was hopeful it was possible but unfortunately it was not to be. Another 4th round loss for Corbalan (his 4th). Arvizu was seeded 31st and met Lazutin in the 3rd round. It went to 5 which was impressive against the 8th seed but not enough to advance. Malmberg won beating Huinaguenta who are both owned by the same manager so great points there except then they (and his two other players) went AWOL. Manager simply stopped playing. It is a little frustrating when they are in the top region of the game (he has the current no 1, no 8 and no 16). They have been entered in the French and Wimbledon but will likely have little form and be easy pickings. Still they affect seedings which is a big thing for some players. With 2000 points from the Australian Malmberg is likely to stay in the top 32/16 for the next year.
He also entered a pair of 250s in Argentina and France, losing to Caravia on clay and Lefebre (a French top 50 player coming up the ranks. The second one hurt and he should have gotten the win and the extra ranking points. Both involved semi final losses which gives 90 ranking points. It won't help him now but may be handy as other results go out of date. Pity. Natalio on the other hand came 2nd in a Challenger in Kazan which brought him back into the top 32 that he has been bouncing in and out of. He also got the chance of a clay 250 competition but was knocked out by the Romanian top seed Gherea in the semi final but a decent performance.

Indian Wells was a good opportunity for points as he only achieved 10 here last year. He managed that after winning his second round tie but lost the third round to the 13th seed Belgy. A tough match that went to a final set but close is not good enough. Arvizu made the 3rd round and came across the hard court specialist Calmette. Beating a top 10 on their favoured court is a big ask and he bowed out gracefully at this point. In Miami the following week Bruno had more points to defend and needed to match a 4th round appearance just to not lose ground which would require beating a higher seed. The seed he had to face was Jan Dieter Baur and he was crushed in the first set before easing himself to the next two by a break each. Good result against the speedy German. He could not do better than the 4th round with a loss to Calmette, the aging French player was relevant enough to keep the 5th seed here. Arvizu matched his Indian Wells performance losing to another top 10 player in the Spainish Ambrosio. Jonathan Stagg won both these masters in a row but Clericat ended up taking back the number 1 spot now that Malmberg is not longer playing.


Bruno did then play a 250 in Morocco. He was seeded 4th and thanks to the top seed Jan Dieter Baur getting upset early was able to make it to the finals. At a 250 competition semi final is a base level for him and a final is a bonus he has only managed once before. The final against the 12th ranked Colanovic went to 3 sets but it was on clay giving Corbalan the edge in the final set for his first singles pro title! I had really began to worry he would not manage one of these so great to see him come through a bit. Arvizu was in the same competition but was upset in the quarters. In Monte Carlo he faced Vilkas, a contempory of Arvizu in the 3rd round and won in 3 to make the quarters. He went against Burmann then who is the reigning French Open champion and the top clay player. He showed it in the first set breezing past Corbalan before Corbalan managed to sneak a tie break in the 2nd and take the 3rd by a single break! In the semi final he went against the Italian Mariani who was unseeded but had faced stiff opposition making it to the semi final. He won the first set but lost the match. Probably one he should have won but he has never made the final in a competition that big. Wihtout a seed Arvizu ended up against Stagg in round 2 and lost easily. Sabiri won another masters title here. Thanks to a weird quirk of being able to take a better result over a poor Monte Carlo result, Malmberg regained the no 1 spot in spite of not playing for a few months. The following week in a 500 competition in Barcelona the strength of the Spainish on clay was shown. Corbalan got revenge on Mariani in the quarters before beating Ambrosio in 3 (lots of tight matches on clay going his way recently) to make the final. All 4 semi finalists were Spainish showing home field advantage and the fact that a lot of the Spainish focus on Clay. This meant Arvizu was also out at this point as he fell to Caravia. He failed to add to his 250 title as this time he lost in 3 sets to Caravia. Still it is 300 ranking points.

With more success than expected recently Corbalan was in danger of being overplayed with 2 masters and a slam in the next month. The first Masters which Arvizu skipped but Corbalan can't and was in Madrid so he did get home field advantage again. His form was impressive breezing past the 7th seed Sabutin and the 3rd seed Sabiri. The first set he lost was getting bagelled by the unseeded Gherea to make his first masters final! It was against Burmann. Burmann is undoubtedly the better clay player but Corbalan won on clay only a few weeks ago. Unfortunately this one went to form and he lost 6/2, 6/2. Still it shows Corbalan might be able to win a major title in the near future. He was now very close to being overplayed and was upset in round 1 to Amati who has been doing better this year and is a clay specialist playing at home. This gave Corbalan a break before the French at least and avoided a meeting between Corbalan and Arvizu who faced Amati in round 2. Arvizu was careful to avoid the upset. He dropped the first but managed to knock out Amati. He followed this up with another 3 set win against Calmette and he beat his fellow countrymate Coya to become the only unseeded player in the semi finals. There he faced world number 1 Stagg and in spite of being bagelled in the second he came through to face Sabiri in the finals. Again it took 3 sets but Arvizu got the job done! My first ever major win.

In the French Corbalan was seeded 14th and Arvizu was 17th thanks to a few missing players adn faced off of 23rd seed Kao in the 3rd round. He lost one set to a tie break but otherwise walked into his 5th time in the 4th round of a slam. 4th in a row as well and first time at the French. These 4th rounds should come easier now that he is getting into the top 16 seeds as well. He was against 6th seed Calmette who is getting on in years and prefers hard courts. Still over 4 close sets Corbalan could not get it done. He is still waiting on his first trip to the second week of a slam. Arvizu was looking for a follow up to his clay masters title and a good result here. Unfortunately he met Burmann in round 3, they had split the mandatory clay masters between them but one had to go out in round 3. The first two games went to tie breaks and Arvizu lost both. Burmann finally won a set cleanly in the 3rd to send Natalio home. Burmann retained his title here cementing his status as the clay king. Bruno has reached his goal of the top 16. Hopefully he can use this to push on. With Malmberg still not playing he drops to 4th and Stagg takes over again at the top. Clericat drops to 3rd with Sabiri taking 2nd. It is still taking a while for the generation before Corbalan to move over entirely with 5 of the top 10 still from that generation. Arvizu is 18th but should move forward soon. He is also now the top Argentinian and will finally get a world cup start next year. It will be handy for ranking points/ experience.


Wimbledon saw Corbalan breeze through the first round before getting Borot as a tough second round opponent. It is difficult to get breaks on grass and Bruno suffered for giving away two easy breaks. 2-0 he managed to clean up his serve a bit and both the next two sets went to tie breaks with Corbalan thankfully coming out on top in both. The final set also reached 6-6 but in Wimbledon there is no final set tie break. You keep playing till there is a two game gap. In the end Corbalan finally got a break to win 4-6/3-6/7-6(2)/7-6(2)/9-7 in an epic marathon. It is tough for Borot who lost in spite of winning at least 6 games every set but I happy he is through. The next match up was against Duane Ayer, the 22nd ranked American. A tough prospect on grass and indeed beat Arvizu in the junior Wimbledon final but can struggle elsewhere with poor baseline game. Here Corbalan's new found skill in tie breaks and he lost the first set to one. He managed to sneak a break to avoid a tie break in the second set but lost the third on a tie break. The fourth saw him give up a break early and he could not recover. So he loses 90 points in comparison to last year and first time he does not make the 4th round in over a year. The loss may be understandable but it is these types of losses that will stop him moving up further. Arvizu lost the opening set but then eased through to the 4th round. Malmberg was in his section and so he had an easy route through as the 4th ranked player is horribly out of form since his manager left the game meaning he had to face no seeds on his way there. Solheim was going to be a tough opponent. Arvizu lost the first set to a break and the next two to tie breaks (stop me if this sounds familiar). Unfortunately another chance to make the final 8 goes a begging. Corbalan got some luck in tie breaks which disappeared and Arvizu did not. Frustrating but it was at least a second 4th round appearance for Arvizu.

A 500 level competition in Germany for Arvizu was a case of good but not good enough taking Clericat to 3 sets but still losing in the quarter finals.

Arvizu skipped Cincinnati but played Canada. As ever Corbalan is obliged to play both. He also had a quarter final appearance to defend in Canada. Arvizu was unseeded in Canada and went out to the similarly unseeded Ezulike in round 2. Corbalan had a tough draw with Jan Dieter Baur who was a great player just starting to slide down the rankings. Two tough sets saw Corbalan go out in round 1 in another Masters. He needs to win these sort of Masters.


The US Open saw Corbalan ranked 16th and Arvizu 18th. Both lost sets in round 1 but made it through to the 3rd without much more trouble. Arvizu lost to Belgy in 4 while Corbalan made it back to the 4th round against Bassagoti. There he faced Calmette back on Calmette's favoured hard court. A frustrating match that saw Corbalan broken twice after leading 40-0 in a game. He went down in 4 which is respectable against a strong player but still no quarter final. Stagg cemented his hard court dominance here with a win.

Arvizu had his first appearance for the national side against Spain on Clay. He lost both matches but gave Clericat a good run for his money and got plenty of experience. They were knocked out and so he won't see national action again till the new year.


Both entered the indoor 250. The frustration kept coming for Arvizu as he lost in the second round. Corbalan kept going to
giving him his 4th win against Lazutin in a row and his 2nd major title.


Arvizu largely stopped attending the big competitions as he was unlikely to get a seed. He will have to next year though. In Shanghai Corbalan made it to the 3rd round before being knocked out by Calmette, it was a base line performance to my mind and better than last year's first round exit. In the Kremlin Open 250 Arvizu somehow ended up being the top seed. It was indoor so he did not completely dominate his opponents but he got the job done for his first 250 level competition.
In the Swiss Open Burmann used home advantage to knock out both Arvizu and Corbalan in the quarter final and semi final respectively. An example of Corbalan using his higher seeding to his advantage.
Paris was again a bit of a squib as Arvizu messed up in round 1 and Corbalan in round 2. I mean Corbalan lost to an ex no. 1 but he should have managed at this point of his career. Clericat won at the age of 29 to ensure entry into the WTF finals. He is the 3 time defending champion and has made the final on each of his 4 appearances so far.

In the end Corbalan finishes in 15th and Arvizu in 17th though there is about 300 ranking points between them. Hopefully they can improve next season, Arvizu will have national team games to help but both will have a lot of points to defend in the clay season. There are places they can get more in the rest of the season but it will be especially tough for Arvizu if he does not repeat in Rome. This will be the first season that Arvizu has to do the all the major competitions. Corbalan made the 4th round in 3 of the slams along side his Madrid semi and Monte Carlo Semi as well as the two 250 level wins. The crown for Arvizu was obviously the win in Rome. Aside from that he had a 4th round appearance in Wimbledon and a 250 win of his own. Both have made good strides with plenty of top 10 wins and winning competitions vs the best in the world. Corbalan went from 25th to 15th and Arvizu from 33rd to 17th.


Clericat made it 4 in a row for the finals in spite of being seeded 7th. Looks like the only way he is losing that now is if he fails to qualify!
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-12-27 1:34:01
In the end Corbolan and Arvizu did not have enough form to make it to week two without penalty. Thankfully Arvizu had International duty week 1 as Argentina posted a win vs the Czech Republic. Both had relatively early losses in the packed 250s of the start of the year. Those are simply warm ups anyway for form. Especially for Corbolan who did suffer from a lack of form a bit. In the Australian Arvizu lost his two opening sets vs the Swedish Bakken before battling back to win 9/7 in the final set. He had an easy round 2 and had Borot in round 3. Not sure how this guy is still ranked so low but he is a tough hard court operator and won easily. Corbolan had an easier route to round 3 where he faced aging countryman Bassagoiti. Should have been an easy enough win and it started off that way winning the first two sets by a break after which he simply could not break his opponent and lost the next two in tie breakers. Thankfully there is no tie breaker in set 5 of the Australian and he won 8/6. Corbolan saved all 13 break opportunities against him. Round 4 was his chance against Borot. I had hopes after he managed to take the first set but he fell after that. Another 4th round exit for Corbolan. In the end it was an all American final with Stagg beating out Ayer. Nicolas Acero entered into the Junior Australian open but did not do great going out to number 9 seed Uwe Dreekmann in the 3rd round. He is currently ranked 10th in the Juniors now.

As further warm ups they both entered into the Argentina Open (250 level) and Rio Open (500 level). 250s are largely for form these days. Once, like Corbolan you have all the slams/masters and 4+ 500 competitions you only count 2 250s. He has two wins in the last year which do him. They will need to replaced as they go out of date though. He could serve to improve his points total for 500s though and Arvizu could benefit out of both, especially as he has to count more 250s having skipped some masters events. In Argentina Corbolan went out to Burmann at the semi final stage but Arvizu made home advantage count to win in the final for his second 250 win! In the Rio Open Burmann was again a problem and beat out Corbolan at the quarter final stage and then got revenge against Arvizu as the two time French champion won out in front of a less biased crowd. Arvizu did well to beat Caravia though in the quarters who is another top clay player. Still it was enough to send Arvizu into 16th ahead of Corbolan! This is significant for seeding in the upcoming Master events even if Arvizu has been largely helped by having the international matches.

In Indian Wells Corbolan managed to sneak the 16th seed as Clericat did not show up for some reason. This should have seen him through to the 4th round but ended up against Kostov, the 23rd ranked hard court specialist in round 3. Not the ideal opponent but still one he should win. He however lost in 3 very close sets. Arvizu had the easier assignment against Bassagoiti. Vilkas, the 4th seed who knocked him out as expected. In Miami Clericat was back pushing Corbolan back to 17th seed. This meant he had to face Sabiri in the 3rd round. The 3rd ranked hard court specialist. Arvizu was upset by Burstrom in the 3rd round. Nicolas Acero came second in a JG1 before getting knocked out to Uwe Dreekmann in the 3rd again in the Copa Gerdau.
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)ChristyGI Supporter
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2013-12-16
III.6
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2017-12-28 14:33:27

Corbolan went to defend his title in a 250 competition in Morocco. The quarters saw him against Amati. Only relevant in the clay court and even then rarely makes enough ground in the big competition. He was still enough for Corbolan here which saw Corbolan lose a bucket load of ranking points. Monte Carlo saw Corbolan defending a quarter final appearance. Round 3 saw him against Burmann which was unfortuante. The two time French Open champion knocked him out. Meanwhile Arvizu continued his good season knocking out the world number 1 Stagg before eventually getting knocked out by the improving Ambrosio in the semi finals who beat Burmann in the final. In the Barcelona Corbolan matched his performance here last year and beat Clericat to make the finals. Ambrosio won but at least it stopped Corbolan losing yet more ranking points for another week.


Madrid was worrying for Corbolan, he was defending a final appearance so plenty more opportunity to lose ranking points. First round he was against Micheal Flynn, an aging Irish man who should not have been an issue. Flynn likes clay but still losing in two with home advantage was embarrassing and saw Corbolan fall to 26th in the world! Arvizu did a bit better but lose to Ambrosio in the 3rd in 3 sets. Tough draw for him, he needs to make more of the clay competitions. Still he has risen to 12th in the world. To change things up in the Italian Open with a loss to Ippolito Carosi. Bah and indeed he drops to 26th as some big results go out of date. Will have to get some new ones soon.


In Rome here it was a bigger deal for Arvizu as he was defending the title. Anything else would see him lose ranking points. In round 2 Corbolan had a rematch against Flynn and this one went to form with Flynn only winning 3 games. Those lost ranking points still sting. The third round put him against country man Clericat but he has beat him on clay before. He manages it again to really cement the decay of the ex world number 1. Burmann in the quarter finals was too much but not a bad performance. Given he was knocked out in round 1 a year ago he should claw back a few of those lost ranking points. Arvizu had a decent draw. Sabiri in round 3 is not bad on clay and neither was Stagg in the quarter finals. They may be world no 1 and 3 but they are not the same threat on clay. He then got a rematch against Vilkas, this time on Arvizu's favoured surface. It was a tough match and realistically he was outplayed. He also nearly through it away losing 3 match points on his own serve to get broken before breaking two games later and taking the match. All of which saw him in the final against Burmann. Another tough match that was decided by Arvizu taking a few more of his break point chances. In the end the point score was 106-105 in Arvizu's favour as he won 7/5, 3/6, 7/5. He retains his Rome title to avoid losing those ranking points. Now on to the French!

The first 3 rounds of the French were relatively easy for both Arvizu and Corbolan. Arvizu did lose a set in the 3rd. Another competition with both players in the 4th was good, Arvizu had Ambrosio and Caravia was Corbolan's opponent. Both tough clay opponents, especially the 3rd seeded Ambrosio. Arvizu had to come back from a set down twice but somehow came up with the upset for my first ever slam quarter final! Corbolan then came up with another 5 setter against Caravia to stick both into the quarter finals of the same slam! Both into week two is a great performance. Their opponents were each other. Arvizu was probably favourite and I was up for him as he would have a greater chance of moving forward. In the end Corbolan took it an early advantage and pressed it to win in 4. The semi final was Corbolan, Vilkas, Stagg and Burmann. Corbolan had Burmann, by far the worst opponent to get on clay. He lost the first two sets before taking a two break advantage in the 3rd. He won it and took another 2 break advantage in the 4th. Suddenly Burmann came roaring back for a deserved win. Would have liked to see what Arvizu could have done there. Still the result reverses Corbolan's failings in the Masters and brings him back to 16th. Arvizu also makes the top 10 with a half decent chance of the top 8 for the year end.

In the Junior French Virgilijus Gramauskus knocked out Acero in the 3rd (he is getting repetitive here).
  

"In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.”— Confucius

 
Forum index >> Off topic >> Rocking Rackets Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4