Has anyone had any joy running an OL as a full back, (William Perry) clearing the way for a more nimble half back?
Since running the ball only is effective versus BOT teams and some very weak new teams, I have not tried any modifications of the standard running game.
I don't think the engine will show much effect using a 400 pound player since weight does not matter either... Only real checks are (IMHO) blocking, agility and vision.
"Quarterbacks should wear a dress." - Jack Lambert
If you are ever feeling down, just know that neither of Dorfenschmirtz's parents showed up to his birth.
Rocky Solo
Posts: 10669
Posted on 2013-04-01 22:33:25
I thought that the running game didnt work against established clubs at first. I run the United Kingdom Nations Cup. Check out what Lilleywhites are achieving in The Premiership with their running game. Just stunning statistics.
projectrracing
Posts: 7952
Posted on 2013-04-02 0:05:34
I use what I would call weak OLinemen at fullback, 18 strength. If you are lining up in a I-formation, then yeah the fullback needs to be just like a OLinemen. But he wont play any good unless he has high BPOS at RB.
I just do what they do in real life, make my TE dual role as FB also.
spartans11
Posts: 704
Posted on 2013-04-02 17:38:50
projectrracing wrote:
I use what I would call weak OLinemen at fullback, 18 strength. If you are lining up in a I-formation, then yeah the fullback needs to be just like a OLinemen. But he wont play any good unless he has high BPOS at RB.
I just do what they do in real life, make my TE dual role as FB also.
I do the same thing, my spare TE is also 5 BPOS at RB
projectrracing
Posts: 7952
Posted on 2013-04-02 23:45:03
I got 2 TE/RB players, about to start working on a third. Why not when there is so many vacant positions in a friendly game?
dgrid
Posts: 78
Posted on 2013-04-05 5:50:30
projectrracing wrote:
I just do what they do in real life, make my TE dual role as FB also.