Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Player Evaluations and Advice.
 
sfniner08
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-04-20 3:07:14
[USA] Glenn Meadows (ID 262542)
Niners4Eva (USA)
17 year old Defensive Lineman

DEF
ATT
Rating Experience Energy 80%
Talent 5 Team chemistry Wage $ 2,447 p/w
SKILLS
Positioning 7 Tackling 3 Punting 7
Vision 6 Blocking 5 Speed 15
Intelligence 1 Passing 1 Strength 9
Footwork 4 Catching 1 Agility 7
Carrying 7 Kicking 5 Stamina 6
OTHER
Teamwork 13 Consistency 15 Weeks at club 23
COMMENTS FROM THE COACH TEAM
Player's natural playing role is Defensive Lineman
He can also play adequately as Tight End and Running Back
If really needed, he can also step in as Linebacker, Cornerback, Kicker and Kick returner


Should I make him my RB or leave him on the D line? thanks
aukj99
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-04-20 6:16:33
If you need a RB, I think he could be a very good one. If you are weaker at DL, I could see him being a pretty good one there, but I would prefer his speed in one of the two backfields.
black78razor
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-04-20 15:46:44
TheFreakinStud wrote:

black78razor wrote:

Positioning 1 Tackling 4 Punting 4
Vision 3 Blocking 5 Speed 7
Intelligence 18 Passing 6 Strength 13
Footwork 7 Catching 7 Agility 2
Carrying 3 Kicking 1 Stamina 3

Teamwork 19 Consistency 11

What should I do with this 16 year old? Was thinking QB but not sure.

Thanks in advance.



With young, talented players, you should always play to your needs. The initially high catching and blocking lead me to say TE. But with some training, he'd make a great OL or MLB. He is fine if you need a QB, but if I was looking for a Franchise QB, he'd have 20 Intel and a higher consistency. But then again, play to your needs. Are you in need of a QB? If so, he'll suffice.



Thanks, I appreciate your answer.

I do need a QB really – my only other viable option currently is 31. I also have a need at RB, and my 31yo QB is also a good fit to play that position for the time being. I have a prospect I like at TE and another I like at LB, although I would have no problem putting the 16yo at either of those positions – I agree (based on my limited knowledge) that seems a natural thing to do.

However, out of the gate, my instinct was, put the 16yo at QB and develop him and leave the 31yo at RB while I find a successor. This is because I assume finding a QB will be much harder than finding a RB.

So I guess what my question boils down to is 1. how hard is it to find a good QB? And 2. will my team be screwed if I can’t find a good successor to the 31yo?
SteelerSal
Posts: 1596
Posted on 2009-04-20 15:56:46
Train him at QB if this is really a position of need.
buckeye1022
Posts: 8799
Posted on 2009-04-20 15:59:47
Train up his vision and he'll be a solid QB. Then if you can't find anybody better(good chance you won't, at least not without paying for it), you at least have a decent guy to lead your offense.
black78razor
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-04-20 16:24:08
Thanks guys, appreciate your thoughts.
TheFreakinStud
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-04-21 10:16:07
I wouldn't be so quick to discount buying a QB. I recently bought my franchise QB for the next 8 seasons at least, and he only cost me $22,050. But if you want to wait and find one in the youth pull(which is always a viable, cheaper alternative) he'll be a fine QB.

You should definitely be on the look out for a young RB though. The running game seems to be easier to establish for newer players, and I doubt you're WR and TE are good enough to lead a passing attack with a rookie QB. And if you're stuck without a RB, you could be looking at some very difficult games.
black78razor
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-04-21 13:17:50
Many thanks guys. Sorry to come back with another problem, but I'd be grateful of any advice regarding these players:

Player #1:
Positioning 1 Tackling 6 Punting 6
Vision 2 Blocking 4 Speed 14
Intelligence 16 Passing 5 Strength 15
Footwork 6 Catching 7 Agility 3
Carrying 5 Kicking 1 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 19 Consistency 15

Player #2:
Positioning 6 Tackling 4 Punting 3
Vision 5 Blocking 5 Speed 14
Intelligence 17 Passing 3 Strength 15
Footwork 2 Catching 7 Agility 7
Carrying 5 Kicking 4 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 20 Consistency 1

Both players are 17. On the surface it seems to me that both have the potential to play multiple positions, so clearly I need to look at my team needs.

Either player it seems would make a pretty nice TE, and this is initially where I planned to put player #2. However my needs are more on the defensive side of the ball, and really I need at least one of these guys to play D. None of my defensive position groups is so good that I couldn’t accommodate either of these players at their best position, it’s just a question of deciding what those positions are.

So, what would you do with these guys?
SteelerSal
Posts: 1596
Posted on 2009-04-21 13:26:39
black78razor wrote:


Player #1:
Positioning 1 Tackling 6 Punting 6
Vision 2 Blocking 4 Speed 14
Intelligence 16 Passing 5 Strength 15
Footwork 6 Catching 7 Agility 3
Carrying 5 Kicking 1 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 19 Consistency 15

Player #2:
Positioning 6 Tackling 4 Punting 3
Vision 5 Blocking 5 Speed 14
Intelligence 17 Passing 3 Strength 15
Footwork 2 Catching 7 Agility 7
Carrying 5 Kicking 4 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 20 Consistency 1

Both players are 17. On the surface it seems to me that both have the potential to play multiple positions, so clearly I need to look at my team needs.

Either player it seems would make a pretty nice TE, and this is initially where I planned to put player #2. However my needs are more on the defensive side of the ball, and really I need at least one of these guys to play D. None of my defensive position groups is so good that I couldn’t accommodate either of these players at their best position, it’s just a question of deciding what those positions are.

So, what would you do with these guys?



Player #1- Wr or DL/DE first, HB second choice (
Player #2- TE first, OL second and HB 3rd choice
TheFreakinStud
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-04-21 21:46:27
black78razor wrote:

Many thanks guys. Sorry to come back with another problem, but I'd be grateful of any advice regarding these players:

Player #1:
Positioning 1 Tackling 6 Punting 6
Vision 2 Blocking 4 Speed 14
Intelligence 16 Passing 5 Strength 15
Footwork 6 Catching 7 Agility 3
Carrying 5 Kicking 1 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 19 Consistency 15

Player #2:
Positioning 6 Tackling 4 Punting 3
Vision 5 Blocking 5 Speed 14
Intelligence 17 Passing 3 Strength 15
Footwork 2 Catching 7 Agility 7
Carrying 5 Kicking 4 Stamina 3

OTHER
Teamwork 20 Consistency 1

Both players are 17. On the surface it seems to me that both have the potential to play multiple positions, so clearly I need to look at my team needs.

Either player it seems would make a pretty nice TE, and this is initially where I planned to put player #2. However my needs are more on the defensive side of the ball, and really I need at least one of these guys to play D. None of my defensive position groups is so good that I couldn’t accommodate either of these players at their best position, it’s just a question of deciding what those positions are.

So, what would you do with these guys?



With guys this close in skill levels. I'd look at the talent level to be the deciding factor, and put the guy with the most talent in the position I thought was the most essential for my team. If they had the same talent level, then I'd look at their current bpos.

Player 1: S or DE would be first, WR/TE second, HB third.
Player 2: WR/TE first, LB second, DE third, HB a very solid fourth.
 
Last posts
2024-10-06 23:22
Magyar nemzeti válogatott
Author:Czuli3
2024-10-05 18:40
Messages I can't delete
Author:philiom
2024-10-05 16:33
Ligathread
Author:liberalmente
2024-10-05 12:40
Verkaufsthread
Author:liberalmente
2024-10-05 10:50
Reprezentácia
Author:Juraj Pavucek
2024-10-05 10:07
Reprezentácia
Author:Hadar