I currently have a player (Levi Jackson) on my team who's a bit of a conundrum, based on his uneven skill sets.
Firstly, he's 19 and has 4 and 1/2 star talent.
He's dumb, but has 15 consistency, with 10 team work.
Naturally, I placed him on the DL. But then he capped at 14, both in speed and strength.
Basically, what I'm wondering is if keeping a player based on his talent alone is worth it, when physicals are capped so low?
Thoughts?
-MACHOMAN.com (on your cd-rom)
Serrie
Posts: 3125
Posted on 2011-06-04 9:15:58
joeblocho44 wrote:
I currently have a player (Levi Jackson) on my team who's a bit of a conundrum, based on his uneven skill sets.
Firstly, he's 19 and has 4 and 1/2 star talent.
He's dumb, but has 15 consistency, with 10 team work.
Naturally, I placed him on the DL. But then he capped at 14, both in speed and strength.
Basically, what I'm wondering is if keeping a player based on his talent alone is worth it, when physicals are capped so low?
Thoughts?
-MACHOMAN.com (on your cd-rom)
he has decent consistency, so maybe kicker/punter?
kong_kaj
Posts: 0
Posted on 2011-06-04 14:23:50
Serrie wrote:
joeblocho44 wrote:
I currently have a player (Levi Jackson) on my team who's a bit of a conundrum, based on his uneven skill sets.
Firstly, he's 19 and has 4 and 1/2 star talent.
He's dumb, but has 15 consistency, with 10 team work.
Naturally, I placed him on the DL. But then he capped at 14, both in speed and strength.
Basically, what I'm wondering is if keeping a player based on his talent alone is worth it, when physicals are capped so low?
Thoughts?
-MACHOMAN.com (on your cd-rom)
he has decent consistency, so maybe kicker/punter?
Either that, or get a capped with better cons, and stick that guy at KR or G.. Useless now, but I figure it might be less useless later.. Even while Im writing this I feel stupid, cause its probably never going to happen