Are TE's wide recievers? I was attempting to set a double widereceiver on both sides. The rules state that no more than 2 wide recievrs on both sides, but when i do it it says illegal. I have a te on that side as well. SO, does that mean a te is a wide receiver? Or why cant i do it?

iwillneverforgetthis wrote: You can have 2 WR's and 1 TE on a side. There must be another reason why it's illegal. But you shouldn't play with 2 WR's on a side

Why is that?
I am playing a bad team today and want to see what happens and give my new wr's some experience too.

BuiltForSpeed wrote: iwillneverforgetthis wrote: You can have 2 WR's and 1 TE on a side. There must be another reason why it's illegal. But you shouldn't play with 2 WR's on a side Why is that? I am playing a bad team today and want to see what happens and give my new wr's some experience too.

It must that i was taking thr RB away. Must have to have an RB.

BuiltForSpeed wrote: TwoPint wrote: It's fine...it's just not the most efficient formation. This new engine is coming just in time since The Darkwing is common knowledge now. What is The Darkwing, duckling?

Check the formation I run.

It involves isolating your top WR and throwing exclusively to him. There are different variations of it...you can use HBs instead of FBs or a WR instead of the TE, but the Standard Darkwing is 2 FBs, 1 WR and 1 TE on one side, then your best WR on the other.

TwoPint wrote: Note that if all of your receivers are the same, then I probably wouldn't do this. But most teams have one WR that will be better than the others.

I see.
I never knew it was the famous Darkwing..lol. Cant believe you named it after your alter ego..lol

Well, my invention The Iron Shield.. is very similar, however it involves HB's and a TE with high blocking on the same side as the best WR. To form an Iron Shield and also draw an extra defender away from the Best WR side. He He....tbc...