I believe that if you prefer a designated side, and the fullback is on that given side, he will see alot more of the ball than he usually would.

Was this the case?

I look forward to hearing from you,

Guru.

greedy, he probably ate the extra hot dog at the team BBQ too.

The only thing I've heard regarding this problem is that if you play an FB in the center of the formation, he will get much fewer carries.

I wouldn't really know though since I don't play an FB.

Solana_Steve wrote: In general, you wouldn't want your fullback to get many carries, right? Fullback is mostly for block, Halfback mostly for running. Steve

Well i dont like that mind set as i like to use the FB and TE in a gameplay of them getting the rock

Jinto wrote: Solana_Steve wrote: In general, you wouldn't want your fullback to get many carries, right? Fullback is mostly for block, Halfback mostly for running. Steve Well i dont like that mind set as i like to use the FB and TE in a gameplay of them getting the rock

Generally, yes the fullback is more for blocking and the halfback is more for running. But it all depends on the kind of running game too. If it's more of a power running game, then the fullback will get his share of carries.

Me personally, if I put someone on the field and he's not on the O-line or on defense, he's going to get the ball from time to time. I don't have to worry about the FB on here because I've been playing a 2 HB set lately, but my TE's can and do get involved in the offense. They aren't as big of a part as the HB or the WR's, but it's a nice change of pace and can catch the defense off guard from time to time.