Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Height vs Talent
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Height vs Talent
 
ahsen74
Posts: 120
Posted on 2010-12-27 13:24:34
When acquiring youth, I had been focusing solely on Talent as the first measure of whether or not to keep or cut a player.

Adding height into the equation had muddled that a bit. Would you keep a 5'7" 5 Star Talent?

Is a 6'7" 2 star talent OL better than my current 6'0" 3.5 star OL (ignoring strength cap, as neither are capped yet)?

Confused as to how to proceed......
  
Serrie
Posts: 3125
Posted on 2010-12-27 13:29:59
ahsen74 wrote:

When acquiring youth, I had been focusing solely on Talent as the first measure of whether or not to keep or cut a player.

Adding height into the equation had muddled that a bit. Would you keep a 5'7" 5 Star Talent?

Is a 6'7" 2 star talent OL better than my current 6'0" 3.5 star OL (ignoring strength cap, as neither are capped yet)?

Confused as to how to proceed......



This is the great thing about the changes, many managers will have different opinions on what is better, creating different teams.
  
jack6
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-12-27 13:32:22
As everybody else.

But think about it. Talant defines the limits for almost every skill.
I doubt that the bonus you get from height and weight will be better than a difference between like 13 passing and 20 passing.
  
Trifco
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-12-27 16:09:32
jack6 wrote:

As everybody else.

But think about it. Talant defines the limits for almost every skill.
I doubt that the bonus you get from height and weight will be better than a difference between like 13 passing and 20 passing.



13 vs 20 sounds pretty obvious, but what about 15 vs 17? Suddenly 3 star players may sound a lot better than before
  
kong_kaj
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-12-27 16:20:51
Trifco wrote:

jack6 wrote:

As everybody else.

But think about it. Talant defines the limits for almost every skill.
I doubt that the bonus you get from height and weight will be better than a difference between like 13 passing and 20 passing.



13 vs 20 sounds pretty obvious, but what about 15 vs 17? Suddenly 3 star players may sound a lot better than before



Why? I dont have more than a couple of players with less than 3,5* talent (subs and veterans), I doubt that I wont be able to find some with height for those positions where I find it important..
  
Trifco
Posts: 0
Posted on 2010-12-27 16:34:50
kong_kaj wrote:

Trifco wrote:

jack6 wrote:

As everybody else.

But think about it. Talant defines the limits for almost every skill.
I doubt that the bonus you get from height and weight will be better than a difference between like 13 passing and 20 passing.



13 vs 20 sounds pretty obvious, but what about 15 vs 17? Suddenly 3 star players may sound a lot better than before



Why? I dont have more than a couple of players with less than 3,5* talent (subs and veterans), I doubt that I wont be able to find some with height for those positions where I find it important..



At least for a small club, players I considered fillers now I'm paying them a bit more attention. If my 3 star OL with the right height and weight will be near as effective as a 3.5 or 4 star player (with not so great height) without a huge wage, then I suddenly have find him way better than last week.
  
BuiltForSpeed
Posts: 994
Posted on 2010-12-27 16:50:40
Trifco wrote:

kong_kaj wrote:

Trifco wrote:

jack6 wrote:

As everybody else.

But think about it. Talant defines the limits for almost every skill.
I doubt that the bonus you get from height and weight will be better than a difference between like 13 passing and 20 passing.



13 vs 20 sounds pretty obvious, but what about 15 vs 17? Suddenly 3 star players may sound a lot better than before



Why? I dont have more than a couple of players with less than 3,5* talent (subs and veterans), I doubt that I wont be able to find some with height for those positions where I find it important..



At least for a small club, players I considered fillers now I'm paying them a bit more attention. If my 3 star OL with the right height and weight will be near as effective as a 3.5 or 4 star player (with not so great height) without a huge wage, then I suddenly have find him way better than last week.


i wouldnt worry about it so much. IMO ONE THING THAT ADMINS ARE MOST CONCERNED ABOUT ARE THE INCOME OF THEIR OWN VENTURE. this new game engine is not yet implemented and if they keep losing supporter accounts it wont happen. just keep doing the same thing you have been doing, then if the shit hits the fan,,,well, it aint te end of the world. high talent players will always overide the height syndrome. remember your ol's.
  
 
Forum index >> Center for rookies >> Height vs Talent