Im intrested too, why would kicker need punting
thats a bit wierd but maybe there is some logic I just happen to be unable to come with

Wolff wrote: Im intrested too, why would kicker need punting thats a bit wierd but maybe there is some logic I just happen to be unable to come with

In RL a K/P needs leg strength to get the distance/ technique to decide the amount of air he needs under the ball. The P could use decent hands for the snap.

You could say the primary skill decides the leg strength and secondary the technique

I think having both skills allow you to back up the other K/P if he gets injured. As for which one is more important, I would say the Punter as I think field position is slightly more important than seeing your prize kicker miss another 35 yarder. I prefer to have a K and a P, but I will back up train the other kicking skill on each of them for any potential injuries that may come up

viktor wrote: Serrie wrote: viktor wrote: Serrie wrote: viktor wrote: kong_kaj wrote: viktor wrote: PK requires kicking and punting and P viceversa. So dont let the 2nd one be 2 low What are you talking about??? Kicker and Punter both require a decent smattering of both skills And why do you think this? GUEss So maybe next time you should say that it is your guess, but that there is no evidence for that. If you want me to I ll (BTW lemme spell out that post slowly for ya GUEss why .....would..... you..... post .....or..... arrive..... at..... an..... opinion ? ) PS : I m sure you have objective empirical evidence to prove otherwise

No I don't, but I dont announce it as if it is a fact.

Serrie wrote: viktor wrote: Serrie wrote: viktor wrote: Serrie wrote: viktor wrote: kong_kaj wrote: viktor wrote: PK requires kicking and punting and P viceversa. So dont let the 2nd one be 2 low What are you talking about??? Kicker and Punter both require a decent smattering of both skills And why do you think this? GUEss So maybe next time you should say that it is your guess, but that there is no evidence for that. If you want me to I ll (BTW lemme spell out that post slowly for ya GUEss why .....would..... you..... post .....or..... arrive..... at..... an..... opinion ? ) PS : I m sure you have objective empirical evidence to prove otherwise No I don't, but I dont announce it as if it is a fact.

And hows that working out for you
P.S. and this ?
P.P.S. While we re at it guess used by itself is a verb