Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Minimum intelligence
 
sfniner08
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-11-16 8:24:16
So, I know there is this nebulous skill importance notion out there, but could we start a discussion about the importance of intelligence at each position? What do you think are the minimus?

QB:
RB:
OL:
WR:
TE:
FB:

DL:
LB:
CB:
SS:
FS:

K:
P:

G:
KR:
STCB:

  
onaj mile
Posts: 526
Posted on 2009-11-16 10:17:30
I think that in real life offensive and defensive are the stupidest.
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-11-16 10:54:52
QB:20
RB:1
OL:20
WR:1
TE:20 (if he really blocks!)
FB:20 (if he really blocks!)

DL: 10
LB: 15
CB: 15
SS: 10
FS: 15

K: 10
P: 10

G: 15
KR: 1
STCB: 15

  
oneknee
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-11-16 12:13:08
Like a lot of skills this is an unknown factor but I tend to go for players in all positions who have intelligence above 10. No absolutes as imho it has a lot less effect than the primary positional skill (eg QB passing etc), BPOS and stamina.
That said I've always gone with high intelligence QBs and the more productive WRs & TEs I've had seem to have had higher intelligence although this may just have been conincidence.
  
Crusader86
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-11-16 12:54:38
QB: 18
RB: 1
OL: 15
WR: 1
TE: 15
FB: 15

DL: 5
LB: 13
CB: 10
SS: 8
FS: 15

K: 18
P: 18

G: 10
KR: 5
STCB: 10
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-11-16 13:11:17
Crusader86 wrote:


DL: 5



Dumb dliners?
  
buckeye1022
Posts: 8799
Posted on 2009-11-16 13:21:21
I tend to think that O-lineman are right up there with QB's as the smartest on the field. I would go:

QB-15
RB-5
WR-5
OL-13
TE-13

DL-10
LB-15
CB-10
S-13

G-1(they just don't matter in this game)
KR-5(about like running backs to me)
K/P-10

Those are my minimums. I'll go a little under those if the player has a good skill set, but not much. Last edited on 2009-11-16 at 14:07
  
MeanMachine
Posts: 3757
Posted on 2009-11-16 13:22:38
pstimpel wrote:

Crusader86 wrote:


DL: 5



Dumb dliners?



That's why they're called DL!
  
mdjseymour
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-11-16 13:24:12
MeanMachine wrote:

pstimpel wrote:

Crusader86 wrote:


DL: 5



Dumb dliners?



That's why they're called DL!



lol


whats with everyone wanting dumb WR's?
  
pstimpel
Posts: 10622
Posted on 2009-11-16 13:26:41
MeanMachine wrote:

pstimpel wrote:

Crusader86 wrote:


DL: 5



Dumb dliners?



That's why they're called DL!



Happy to see you next time on the field when you tell this your opposite DLiner



mdjseymour wrote:


whats with everyone wanting dumb WR's?




WRs.. How could INT help tem?
  
 
Last posts