Thanks for the many congratulations.

I do believe that Stevie and I had the best teams this season, and had I not botted in the first game between us, the last game would not have mattered- But the result of season 34 is in the books and I doubt that I will be able to retake the throne next season, so it is there for grabbing.

@Stevie - How about a friendly next week to see who has the bragging rights for seaosn 35? Full strength - no backups.

hemoroid wrote: SrednaD wrote: @Stevie - How about a friendly next week to see who has the bragging rights for seaosn 35? Full strength - no backups. Brilliant idea! Cause winning a meaningless friendly can totally compensate for getting robbed of a league title! You should be ashamed, THIEF!

Normally, I would let that comment fly and respond with the Danish word "Pyt", but I fail to see how Melchett's lack of tactics can be blamed on me. His actions are his and I have PM'ed him about his reasons and he answered me. I am - as I have stated earlier - not proud of the way that I won the title, but I set my tactics and I played my game.

As the dice have been rolled now, I will represent AS&E in the AFLC and will do my best as I do care for this game - as I have done since 2010 and will continue to do so.

Fire your comments elsewhere and get on with playing the game and enjoy me being clobbered by better teams in AS&E next season. This division is by far the toughest and anyone in AS&E TD and div II should be proud of where they are. No (or few) BOTs, great coaches and sometimes a lively forum with exchange of ideas, thoughts and jokes.

hemoroid wrote: SrednaD wrote: but I fail to see how Melchett's lack of tactics can be blamed on me. His actions are his and I have PM'ed him Of course you've exchanged PMs, he told you exactly how he was going to play for you to set the attack/defense orders accordingly! bot tactics would've been too obvious.

So I played my standard tactics because... ????

hemoroid wrote: Of course you've exchanged PMs, he told you exactly how he was going to play for you to set the attack/defense orders accordingly! bot tactics would've been too obvious.

We did not have any PM's before the game. I PM'ed him after the game to tell him that he was a fool and that he should have played the game fair and square so the best man could win. The difference was 4 points, and Raiders only winning by 14 was close enough for my team to beat since I truely believe that my team would have won by at least 2 scores.

But that brings us to the 52-0 game Raiders and I played in week one... why are you not looking at that game? I botted my defence and would Raiders have won the TC, would you then be screaming as you are now about DLG being a puppet of Raiders?

Grab a hold of Melchett and ask him the questions.

hemoroid wrote: Did you defend against rush on all downs? If that's the case it sure is fishy cause the Pidgeon Murderers had been switching their attack between pass and rush in their previous games.

Dude, you've been playing for three seasons. You're talking about Sredna's private messages that you haven't seen, pretending you're an expert authority. Your opinion here is not important.