This season I have decided to try some things out with the running game, and so far the only thing I have discovered is that the devs have some maths issues
let me explain..
In this game vs Kungälv Gulls I decided to set the run at 50% on first, second and third down and this is what I ended up having during the game :
9/19 first down were runs (close enough^^)
11/15 second down were runs (over 75%)
9/10 third down were runs (90%)

In this game vs Zaragoza Pro'sI decided to set the run at 20% on first, second and third down and this is what I ended up having during the game :
2/23 first down were runs (less than 9%)
2/19 second down were runs (10%)
1/9 third down were runs (11%)

I will continu to try things out in the coming weeks but I doubt the problem is coming from my QB being disobedient.
In the meantime, if some of you have noticed some similarities with your running game please let me know and post your results here.

hades wrote: In this game vs Kungälv Gulls I decided to set the run at 50% on first, second and third down and this is what I ended up having during the game : 9/19 first down were runs (close enough^^) 11/15 second down were runs (over 75%) 9/10 third down were runs (90%) In this game vs Zaragoza Pro'sI decided to set the run at 20% on first, second and third down and this is what I ended up having during the game : 2/23 first down were runs (less than 9%) 2/19 second down were runs (10%) 1/9 third down were runs (11%)

Sorry for saying this but this is ridiculous (stupid) statistic.

So, according to you, all of us that have orders at 10% running must get 6 running play & 54 passing plays on 60 total snaps????

Flip a coin 10 or 20 times. What are the odds to get same no of times heads and tails? Each time you have 50% chance to get tail and 50% to get head. But in total there is little chance to get 50% of each side after 20, 30, 50 throws.

Or throw a dice. You have 1/6 chance to get no 1. Are you really sure that in 60 throws you will get no 1 10 times??? Each time you have 83,4% to get no from 2 to 6 and only 16,6% chance to get no 1.

Please stop doing your statistic. Just a waste of time.

3 comments, as i am experimenting with similar
1. QB does change about 10% of the plays.
2. Small sample, need more. Variance does cause funny small samples. Bigger one suggests around 10% variance.
3. If a QB ends up with the run, then i believe it was a passing play call.

pumuckl wrote: It is absolutely funny if someone talks about how random number generators have to work, without knowing how they work

It is funny, I agree and I needed a good laugh

hhhhaHAa ahah AHA ha hha HAH ahah hah