I know it's utopian, but what do I lose by asking?
It makes no sense for a player to play Wednesday by regional cup, Thursday by AFLC and Sunday is cool to play the league game.
It would be logical for a player to have a fatigue for consecutive matches, so the teams that qualify for the AFLC will have to manage their teams better and weaken a little in the league, making the league more interesting for those who did not qualify and have their Rested camp.
It would be correct that the match on Monday does not tire them much since it is definitely a workout.
Only if the economy is reviewed and compensatory things happen that increase the amount of money earned or lower salaries. The end result of the fatigue change would by necessity be expansion of team rosters. Otherwise you'd have folks picking and choosing what games would be "important", which isn't necessarily in the best interest of the overall game itself.
Only if the economy is reviewed and compensatory things happen that increase the amount of money earned or lower salaries. The end result of the fatigue change would by necessity be expansion of team rosters. Otherwise you'd have folks picking and choosing what games would be "important", which isn't necessarily in the best interest of the overall game itself.
but.... will be more realistic.
I do not know if it happens in the United States, but in Argentina and all South America at least that happens, the teams that play two competitions, necessarily weaken in one of the two, on the other hand if you play AFLC, you have extra income with Which could solve the expenses of extra players.