Administrator wrote: We are currently working on some new things for GI and one of those things is also an option to buy a supporter via mobile phone. Option: 1 week or 1 month supporter Price: 20% - 30% higher price due to high commissions What do you think, should we implement this or not?

Whatever, but if you do it, use HTTPS please. Mobile transactions are woefully insecure these days.

Source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/four-major-airlines-don-t-use-https-expose-customer-credit-card-numbers-497380.shtml

Tingting wrote: Oh & Project again just a quick glance there are well over 80 players for both India & Malaysia, although at least 30 of the Indian players are over 40 & 3 of those are over 50, I think 1 is actually in his coffin, lol I only used China a you mentioned them

India has nil human mangers and only 1 team safe from being taken over. Only 28 of those 80+ players are safe.

Malaysia has only 1 human team and is the only team safe from being taken over also. Said team has only 16 Malaysian nationals on the roster.

Like I said, don't just look at the teams, look at the rosters. Majority of those 80+ players you mention from from the lowest tier division in Asia, and at any time the team could be taken over and the players removed from the game. Not even close to being sustainable for a national team.

Like I said, I'm all for additions to the World Cup. Having 5 nations for each group would be awesome. But not one manager in the past few cycles has offered a solution or found a nation with a sustainable pool to fill their roster. Would be happy to be proven wrong also.

I don't even know how New Zealand and Bulgaria get to 50 players on their rosters every cycle. Some magic going on there. haha

Bulgaria to their credit have 6 or 7 active sides, which is alot more than can be said for Turkey, who have one side in the Stallions.

Which makes their good performances this cycle even more miraculous.

Tingting wrote: projectrracing wrote: Example a nation that has enough players to make a 50 player roster. Don't just look at the teams available, look at their rosters. philiom wrote: until international players retire when they are meant to.... Which isn't going to get changed soon Got to admit those are the 2 most valid arguments against increasing & I agree with both Just implementing Philiom's point & replacing them with new youth's will automatically solve both problems But as he also said" that's not going to happen soon" I will bring it up again next NT cycle Project, Having these debates, in theory, "should" stimulate the developers to introduce features like this & other things talked about on the forums into the game, thus increasing playability, increasing interaction, increasing attractiveness(of the game), increasing coaches, which would surely increase their profits. I wonder if Lee Suggs has suggested anything like that,

Here's a suggestion from left field....how about the international manager also gets a youth pick each week so that over the 19/20 week season he may get 2/3 4+ talented players that he can bring through himself or sell into the transfer system..... Suspect somebody could improve that idea slightly and I'd still insist that the international players retire when they are meant to

The developers don't exist.