Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Next Generation Australian squad
Forum index >> Australia >> Next Generation Australian squad Goto page : 1, 2, 3 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
 
hosh13
Posts: 2985
Posted on 2015-01-18 8:58:51
Bloodbeak wrote:

hosh13 wrote:

Bloodbeak wrote:

It is possible to play one KR in both slots. I saw a team do it earlier this year. link



...and funny thing is, he is listed twice in the stats!

Looks like it had no adverse effects.


Definitely not, the guy essentially had two 100+ yard games in the one game. As someone who doesn't place a great deal of value in KRs, I was impressed.

Since then, I've been leaning towards having the one guy take care of all kick returns eventually. The part of me that likes American Football currently compels me to keep two, but this will change.



Must only work in friendlies - I had my starting SF playing as the other K/P returner today!

Glad to find this out now instead of next Friday!
  
projectrracing
Posts: 7952
Posted on 2015-01-18 9:12:56
hosh13 wrote:

daudy had Lucas as K and Sellar as punter. Sellar has good vis but only 4.5 BPOS. Might be a slight stam advantage in having the 2 split - both have average stam.

Thoughts?

tacticals and stamina mean nothing to kickers or punters.

the lucas/sellar combo has been working for many seasons.
  
hosh13
Posts: 2985
Posted on 2015-01-18 9:29:10
projectrracing wrote:

hosh13 wrote:

daudy had Lucas as K and Sellar as punter. Sellar has good vis but only 4.5 BPOS. Might be a slight stam advantage in having the 2 split - both have average stam.

Thoughts?

tacticals and stamina mean nothing to kickers or punters.



So wouldn't it be better to use Lucas in both roles since he is 20 at both and has the 5* BPOS?
  
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)BloodbeakGI Supporter
Posts: 2362
Joined: 2013-10-10
I.1
Offline
Hard-core fan (ultimate supporter owner)
Posted on 2015-01-18 13:24:45
hosh13 wrote:


Must only work in friendlies - I had my starting SF playing as the other K/P returner today!

Glad to find this out now instead of next Friday!


I gave it a try too, but had a DL out there in the right slot instead of the chosen guy. Mystifying stuff.
  

"Some people have way too much thyme on their hands"
- Phat Katt

hosh13
Posts: 2985
Posted on 2015-01-18 13:43:21
Bloodbeak wrote:

hosh13 wrote:


Must only work in friendlies - I had my starting SF playing as the other K/P returner today!

Glad to find this out now instead of next Friday!


I gave it a try too, but had a DL out there in the right slot instead of the chosen guy. Mystifying stuff.




I'm going to try leaving it blank in my next league game but I reckon it'll do the same thing.
  
katsuben
Posts: 106
Posted on 2015-01-21 12:29:23
hosh13 wrote:

projectrracing wrote:


Lucca Bock can probably be dropped also. He is our TE4 behind McLeod, Grose and Jones. Bock will never get a run with those decline physicals. Insert Edward Shirley into the roster.


Bock stays else we're down to only 3 TEs.



Uhm, bit late but my boy Adrian Small (1133894) seems better option?

4.5*

Catching - 18
Footwork - 19
Blocking - 17
Agility - 17
Speed - 16
Strength - 17
Stamina - 16
Consistency - 14

Over-trained footwork accidentally, so now on the way to straight 19s.

Also should have mentioned earlier that 5* S Schulz is also a 5* CB.
  
hosh13
Posts: 2985
Posted on 2015-01-21 21:14:27
katsuben wrote:


Uhm, bit late but my boy Adrian Small (1133894) seems better option?

Also should have mentioned earlier that 5* S Schulz is also a 5* CB.



Small missed out due to so so physicals (same as Bock) and tacticals @ 7. Bock has very high tacticals.

I know about Schulz too - 17/12 physicals not nearly good enough imo. We have a ton of CBs and quite a few options at SF also so..................

I have assessed every player mentioned by their coaches and then some.
  
katsuben
Posts: 106
Posted on 2015-01-25 3:41:08
hosh13 wrote:

katsuben wrote:


Uhm, bit late but my boy Adrian Small (1133894) seems better option?

Also should have mentioned earlier that 5* S Schulz is also a 5* CB.



Small missed out due to so so physicals (same as Bock) and tacticals @ 7. Bock has very high tacticals.

I know about Schulz too - 17/12 physicals not nearly good enough imo. We have a ton of CBs and quite a few options at SF also so..................

I have assessed every player mentioned by their coaches and then some.



Physicals better than Bock, fwiw.
  
katsuben
Posts: 106
Posted on 2015-01-26 10:36:32
Well, I just checked stats for my other TE Hadley, and with around 60 catches apiece he's gained 5 yds more per reception than Small, and has double the number of TDs.

Hadley's catching and footwork are 2 pts behind Small (17s vs 19s), they're equal in other mains, but Hadley has a 5-star rating, 20 intel, and 19 vs 17 strength. Guessing that latter stat is the real deal-breaker. Still a bit surprised by the huge difference in numbers...
  
hosh13
Posts: 2985
Posted on 2015-01-26 14:36:43
Yeah, BPOS and STR for my money.

I think there's a chance that spd doesn't even count for TEs either.
  
 
Forum index >> Australia >> Next Generation Australian squad Goto page : 1, 2, 3 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18